Name two roman historians and explain how they differed

History

1 answer:

murzikaleks [220]3 years ago

3 0

Two Roman Historians and There Difference:

· Titus Livy – The Roman Historian who is responsible for writing or making use of legends. He was able to write the monumental history of the Rome and even its people.

· Aeneas Tacticus – The Roman Historian responsible for writing history that is factional. He is considered to be one of the earliest Greek Writers.

You might be interested in

Why were New England Colonies’ farms smaller than Southern Colonies’ farms?

Kryger [21]

<h3>Option B. The rocky soil meant extra work</h3>

In addition, the soil is rocky or sandy, and generally poor for growing crops. As a result, farming in New England was limited to small farms on which families managed to grow enough to feed themselves and not much else.

3 0

2 years ago

To find an historical perspective about the 20th century it would be best to consult

Paladinen [302]

Nonfiction book or ebook

7 0

3 years ago

How did he United States develop politically and economically in the early 1800s ?

Ksenya-84 [330]

The main way in which the United States developed politically during this time was that the Republican Party formed as an anti-slavery platform, while economically the nation flourished due to the creation of railroads.

Explanation:
As a British, I will tell you regarding the war of 1812 from the Canadiana perspective and a small amount regarding the North American country. i do know there have been 2 sides developing in congress, one that culturally leant towards British and tradition, one thatleant militarily and in terms, the of alliance to the French, and shared revolutionary ideals.
The French facet was regarding triumphant and thanks to each the French and British did not permit the North American country to be economically neutral, the North American country had to travel to war with one or the other: with the invasion of the canadas, James Madison basically joined the French facet of the war.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What percentage of the member nations had to approve any decisions made by the League of Nations?

Archy [21]

Answer:

100%

Explanation:

The League of nations or as it is known by its abbreviation LON was a intergovernmental and multinational organisation established in 1920. It was founded after the first world war and its principal mission was to bring world peace. It ceased to operate in 1946.

To approve any decision , Unanimity was required that means 100% of members have to agree upon it. As a result, any representative may theoretically veto any proposal. In fact, such an occurrence was extremely uncommon.

5 0

3 years ago

What were the strengths and weaknesses of the communist world by the 1970s?

NeX [460]

By the 70s, communism had reached the greatest extent of expansion. The Soviet Union had matched its military might with the U.S. However, divisions within the communist world increased, especially between Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, China and the Soviet Union, and China and Vietnam. The horrors of Stalin's Terror and the gulag, of Mao's Cultural Revolution, and of something approaching genocide in communist Cambodia all wore away at communist claims to moral superiority over capitalism.

7 0

3 years ago