Answer:
ADVANTAGES OF ANCIENT ATHENS
A. Decisions are made quickly because of the practice of monopoly.
B. Enables the form of oligarchy form of government that accommodate the upper middle class in governance.
C. It is hereditary in nature because the throne succession has be stated.
DISADVANTAGES OF ANCIENT ATHENS
A. The elite in the society is restricted to the elite of the oligarchy.
B. Single rule that do not consider other opinions.
C. Greed of the ruler or leader of the monarchical government
Explanation:
The ancient Athens is the largest among all cities in the ancient Athens that was established in the year 503 BC.
The system of government that was use during period is the monarchical form of government where powers are mainly concentrated in the hands of the oligopoly who is the final decision maker in all issues that concerns the city.
The oligarchy make decisions faster on issues because there is no need for wider consultations in deciding on issues. The upper class with the middle class are the ones who control the government without the contribution of the lower class who are seen as subject of the oligarchy
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
Many say that Truman was justified in dropping the first bomb and it kept a land invasion of Japan from occurring but that he didn't give the Japanese enough time to surrender and that the second bomb was ethically problematic.
America's presence in world affairs would decrease
