The correct answer is the Fiedler’s contingency theory. This
is a type of contingency theory by which it shows or focuses on the
effectiveness of leadership that are likely to base on a particular situation and
the numerous factors that may take place.
Answer:
A:3, B:1, C:2
Explanation:
1. Concurrent jurisdiction: Cases involving state and federal questions and cases.
2. Exclusive state jurisdiction: Cases involving all matters not subject to federal jurisdiction.
3. Exclusive federal jurisdiction: Cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Concurrent jurisdiction arises in cases which can be heard in more than one court, it allows more than one court the authority to hear a case, for example divorce cases can be heard in a local district level court, a family court or any one of the district courts
Federal jurisdiction arise in cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Exclusive state jurisdiction arises in cases not subject to federal laws but state laws
It depends on the subject matter of the presentation. If persuasion is your goal, then use emotional appeals, but if you're simply trying to present for the purpose of informing, then analytical is the way you should go. <span />
The answer for this question is: Fictive kinship
In sociology, fictive kinship refers to the social ties that is formed to the point where two persons acknowledge each other as a brother/sister even though they do not possess any form of blood relations.
Usually, people form this kind of ties after experiencing hardship together.
Answer:
I am so sorry for this answer but, I don't know this and I don't want to ignite your question I hope someone else can help you with this and that could can get the answer just in time!!
Explanation:
I am not sure of what this answer is so I have no explanation or a reasoning!!
