Answer:
This statement is false.
Explanation:
<u>Jeremy Bentham</u> (15 February 1748 – 6 June 1832) was the one who considered all types of pleasures to be equal, while <u>John Stuart Mill</u> (20 May 1806 – 7 May 1873) argued that <u>there are higher and lower types of pleasures</u>. Intellectual pleasures, such as having a good intellectual conversation, and moral, such as helping someone in need, to be <em>higher </em>pleasures. Meanwhile, physical pleasures, such as eating a tasty chocolate cake, he considered to be <em>lower</em>. Moreover, Mill argued that pleasures achieved actively are more valuable that those which are achieved passively, and in general human should strive to achieve higher pleasures and ultimately happiness.
Answer:
The status of women in Nepal has varied throughout history. In the early 1990s, like in some other Asian countries, women in Nepal were generally subordinate to men in virtually every aspect of life. Historically, Nepal has predominantly been a patriarchal society where ... Also, social norms and values were biased in favor of men.
Explanation:
and thats it hope it helps
<span>It is letter D. The supremacy clause condition is the most critical underwriter of national union. It guarantees that the Constitution and government laws and arrangements overshadow state law and ties all judges to cling to that standard in their courts. The supremacy clause is the area of the Constitution expressing that the Constitution and government laws made in promotion of the Constitution are the incomparable traditions that must be adhered to. The supremacy clause likewise implies that states can't manage, meddle with, or control government issues.</span>
Answer:
A. both Jonathan's and Joanna's cases
Explanation:
Legal implication: The term "legal implication" is described as a phenomenon that is considered as the consequences or results in which an individual in being involved something inappropriate according to the specific law. Legal implications can either be negative or positive.
Ethical implication: The term "ethical implication" is described as a phenomenon in which various matter is being considered based on an ethical viewpoint. It is considered as the human principle based on wrong and right.
In the question above, the correct answer is A.
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
