The Answer is D. The North European Plain
Actually it will always depend on the commanders and type of battle that will commences. Also it will depend on the economic stature of the country and whether it could outwit the other countries in case of war of attrition. Each of the country has their own strength and weaknesses that can attribute to the victory and defeat of the country. If we would based the performance between the three countries in world war 2 period, Germany can oust the two countries in a fast war based on the army size. If it would be a naval combat based on the choices it would be Great Britain can win due to the advantage but statistics can only forecast and can't be an accurate based on victory like the U-boat campaign of the Germans that damage the prestige of the Royal Navy. If in reserves and manpower the French could muster a large amount of men and has an average size of army and navy that can stand a battle against the other countries stated.
the answer is 1. The map with the whole country shows the distribution of gold,coal and oil minerals and the other map shows the expansion of the USA, clearly due to the riches found in these areas,as most of them, are located in the West.
2. The US gained the wealth the under the soil, gold, oil and coal, mainly gold and oil.
The United States shouldn't have declared war against Mexico because it was its land and though not fully explored and populated the regionhad also Native American nations, an alternative buy be to buy or get agreements to explore the regions. A second reason is that it is a clearly example of a stronger nation preying on a weaker one, an atittude which many countries do not accept.
Counterargument: It was their right to keep their state and not invade and declare war because of land.
Even though some people think that it was their right to keep the land, one could argue that caudillo-like states, as in South America, could emerge and an elite would totally dominate the poorer on the exploration of the weath.
can i get brainliest i already know the answer hope this helps
Answer:
Henry was an energetic and sometimes ruthless ruler, driven by a desire to restore the lands and privileges of his grandfather Henry I. During the early years of his reign the younger Henry restored the royal administration in England, re-established hegemony over Wales and gained full control over his lands in Anjou
King John's reign began with military defeats – he lost Normandy to Philip II of France in his first five years on the throne. His reign ended with England torn by civil war and himself on the verge of being forced out of power.
king Edward I, His reign is particularly noted for administrative efficiency and legal reform. He introduced a series of statutes that did much to strengthen the crown in the feudal hierarchy. His definition and emendation of English common law has earned him the name of the “English Justinian.”
Nationao guard troops killed several students
