Answer:
Explanation:
I don't think it's possible to make a bad speech about 9/11. I married an American who was at home getting ready to go to work when it happened. We don't watch television. We're both too busy. But we have one. I phoned home at somewhere around 8:00 or 9:00 and told her she could be a little late, but she had to turn on the TV. She didn't want to do but I insisted. So she did it. I saw her an hour later. There were streak marks coming away from her eyes.
She didn't say much. She just said "Who would want to do that? Why did they do it?"
That's basically all she had to say.
President Bush was saying much the same thing. In general that's the way most people responded. There was shock and there were tears. The indignation and anger came later. But for a bit, everybody was a New Yorker trying to make out what happened. Trying to sympathize.
Just trying to feel the horror that befell them.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the options for this question.
However, trying to help you we can comment on the following.
The individual who popularized the idea that people accused of crimes should be considered innocent unless proven guilty was William Blackstone.
William Blackstone(1723-1780) was an English jurist. He wrote the Commentaries on the Laws of England. The work is considered the best description of the doctrines of English law, and from then, it was the foundation of legal education in England and U.S. colleges. And yes, he was the individual who popularized the idea that people accused of crimes should be considered innocent unless proven guilty.
Answer:
D. ability to make major changes in a short period of time
Explanation:
While other options are can be true of a command economy in certain situations, option D is the only option that I would classify as an advantage of a command economy over a Market Economic System. However, major changes in a short time can have disastrous consequences, for example the 6-7 million deaths that resulted from Stalin's five year plan.
Hello! The coastline was definitely destroyed during the tsunami. Therefore, D is eliminated. There was a lack of food and no clean water, because the area was destroyed. Many were starving. A and B are also out. There were not mass animal deaths, because there were very few of the bodies found afterwards. The answer is C.
The technologies were only used to observe enemies but as their effectiveness became apparent, both sides started to dismantle what they were using. For example, they shot down the planes that they would see causing more death.
