As a result of the media being involved, the Civil Rights movement was affected as follows:
- It caused more people to join the movement by alerting African Americans of civil rights campaigns taking place around the country.
- It applied pressure on political leaders to support policies designed to combat discrimination.
- It increased public support for protesters by showing attacks on Black people on television.
<h3>Media Influence on Civil Rights Movement </h3>
As a result of television and news scenes showing Black people being attacked when they exercised their right to protest, many joined the cause to support them. These media outlets also showed the different campaigns happening around the country which allowed people to show up for them.
Political leaders therefore came under heavy pressure to combat discrimination based on what the people saw and the protests that ensued.
In conclusion, the media was very important to the civil rights movement.
Find out more on the Civil Rights Movement at brainly.com/question/131269.
The second amendment says that americans have the right to bare arms. That is a federal law, what state laws say is a different story. But according to federal law, yes
The correct answer is Equity
Equity securities are those that provide you with a steady income. Investments work so that when you invest money, you get an income from the company based on your investment. This is why it's an equity security and not a debt security.
Answer:
The electoral college system was the best solution they chose to democratically elect a president in a way that was both consistent with republican values and with the protections of rights of smaller states.
Explanation:
The Constitution and the new laws in the United States were revolutionary and pioneering by the end of the 18th century. The Founding Fathers could not look at a previous democratic model to find inspiration, because autocracy was the system of government anywhere else. One of the great dilemmas of democracy is how to avoid the tyranny of majorities over minorities. Could they have thought of a better system then? Maybe it was possible in theory, but it was very hard in practice. Besides, the population of the fomer colonies wasn´t as large as it´s today, and there were only 13 states, not 50. They could hardly have envision some outcomes we´ve seen in recent years when some candidates have won the popular vote, but have failed to win key states and electoral votes. They chose what they saw as the best option.
