1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
3 years ago
11

Which of the following was not one of Martin Luther King Jr’s goals?

History
1 answer:
Serjik [45]3 years ago
5 0
B “any means necessary” contradicts “nonviolent methods”
You might be interested in
1) Which of the rulers followed endogamy
Grace [21]

The correct answer is C) Muryas.

The Mauryas rulers followed endogamy.

The term endogamy that people get married in the same family line. For the Mauryas, marriage outside the family line was forbidden.

In 332 BC, the Maurya Empire was founded by Chandragupta Maurya. He defeated the troops of the Nanda Dynasty, conquering territories in the west and central India, making it one of the largest empires of that time. It reached the northern parts of India, the border with the Himalayas, to modern-day Afghanistan and Iran.

4 0
3 years ago
Which philosopher believed that people were inherently evil and that government should control them?
Inessa05 [86]

Explanation:

In 1651, Thomas Hobbes famously wrote that life in the state of nature – that is, our natural condition outside the authority of a political state – is ‘solitary, poore, nasty brutish, and short.’ Just over a century later, Jean-Jacques Rousseau countered that human nature is essentially good, and that we could have lived peaceful and happy lives well before the development of anything like the modern state. At first glance, then, Hobbes and Rousseau represent opposing poles in answer to one of the age-old questions of human nature: are we naturally good or evil? In fact, their actual positions are both more complicated and interesting than this stark dichotomy suggests. But why, if at all, should we even think about human nature in these terms, and what can returning to this philosophical debate tell us about how to evaluate the political world we inhabit today?

The question of whether humans are inherently good or evil might seem like a throwback to theological controversies about Original Sin, perhaps one that serious philosophers should leave aside. After all, humans are complex creatures capable of both good and evil. To come down unequivocally on one side of this debate might seem rather naïve, the mark of someone who has failed to grasp the messy reality of the human condition. Maybe so. But what Hobbes and Rousseau saw very clearly is that our judgements about the societies in which we live are greatly shaped by underlying visions of human nature and the political possibilities that these visions entail.

5 0
3 years ago
What are the types of the political machines.?
Brut [27]
Political machine<span>, </span><span>in </span>U.S.<span> politics, a party organization, headed by a single boss or small autocratic group, that commands enough votes to maintain political and administrative control of a city, county, or </span>state<span>.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Im going to give 20 points:)
Wewaii [24]

The options that, in Wilson's view, would lead to another war:

<h2> Group B </h2>

Explanation:

Group A includes options that were part of President Woodrow Wilson's "14 Points." The 14 Points were set forth by Wilson in a speech he delivered to Congress in January, 1918.  The 14 Points were his proposals for how to end the Great War (World War I) and establish international peace.  

"Creating an organization to discuss and resolve problems" was his key idea, which was Point #14 of his proposals. Wilson worded it this way: "A general association of nations must be formed under specific covenants for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small states alike."  

"Agreeing not to form secret alliances" was Point #1 of Wilson's proposals.

----------

Group B includes provisions that were indeed adopted in the Treaty of Versailles, and proved to be actions that did lead to a Second World War.

The Treaty of Versailles, which came out of the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, was very punitive towards Germany.  Germany was forced to admit responsibility for causing the Great War (World War I).  We now call that "the war guilt" clause of the treaty.  The German military had major restrictions imposed on it -- it had to be a volunteer military only, of no more than 100,000 men, and they could not have an air force. Germany also was forced to pay large reparation payments to the Allies (who opposed Germany in the war).   The German economy and national pride were deeply wounded.  The Great Depression was worse in Germany than in America.  The bad situation in Germany made it possible for a radical leader like Hitler, making all sorts of bold promises, to win over enough people to rise to power.  Hitler promised a return to national greatness and fiercely rebuilt Germany as a military machine.  The rise of Hitler and the Nazis brought about World War II in Europe.

3 0
3 years ago
By 1838, Andrew Jackson's policy toward American Indians resulted in the
Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

A. The Indian Removal Act

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did European exploration of the americas change trade patterns
    10·1 answer
  • Why didn’t Andrew Jackson ever know his father?
    11·2 answers
  • Constructed Response Use complete sentences to write the answers in the space provided 19 Approximately how much did the global
    8·1 answer
  • What are the five major ways that can change language?
    10·2 answers
  • How did most settlers view themselves in relation to england
    11·1 answer
  • 1. The quote "God! What a job!" was once spoken by President
    6·1 answer
  • After a rebellion in 132 AD,the Romans ____________ ,
    7·2 answers
  • What did 54 40 of fight mean?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is significant about the Kingdom of Songhai?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the federalist position on the constitution in 1787.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!