Answer:
By extending their arguments to address entire nations, some social Darwinists justified imperialism on the basis that the imperial powers were naturally superior and their control over other nations was in the best interest of human evolution.
Ethnocentric: Imperial nations sometimes believed that their cultural values or beliefs were superior to other nations or groups. Imperial conquest, they believed, would bring successful culture to inferior people. Empires sought strategic territory to ensure access for their navies and armies around the world.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Bretton Woods system established in 1944 changed the international monetary system by replacing the gold standard with the U.S. dollar as the international currency. To control the new arrangement, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, were created.
Explanation:
Despite the system collapsing in 1973, leaving to each country the decision on about their currency as long as pegging its value to the price of gold is not an option, the institutions created are still today a fundamental element in economic international relationships.
Answer:
Your question is very ambiguous. Assuming that your question is about colonization, I would try my best to answer. Colonization (taking of land) was justified into three categories: God, gold, and glory.
Explanation:
<h2>Europeans justified their colonialism that what their doing is "holy work" because they are widening their religious belief (Christianity) to save indigenous people. They used religion to justified their brutal ways of taking the land away from the "indians" and they believed that by their influence, they were giving them a "better" life. Europeans also justifies their colonization by expanding their kingdom and making them more powerful (glory). Lastly, colonization happened because people seek more riches (gold) and spices. </h2>
Answer:
portrays God as a good shepherd, feeding (verse 1) and leading (verse 3) his flock. ... God, as the caretaker, leads the sheep to green pastures (verse 2) and still waters (verse 2) because he knows that each of his sheep must be personally led to be fed.
Explanation:
Hmm hard one to answer see if this is correct
It would be tax.........................................................