Answer:
false
His purchase left GDP unchanged
Consumption of non durables would increase.
Also, net export would decrease.
these effects would cancel out
Explanation:
Gross domestic product is the total sum of final goods and services produced in an economy within a given period which is usually a year
GDP calculated using the expenditure approach = Consumption spending by households + Investment spending by businesses + Government spending + Net export
Net export = exports – imports
Answer:
$15.43
Explanation:
Following actions are required for triangular arbitrage:
Available: $ 10,000
Buy sterling pound @ 1 $ = 1.62 pounds and receive pounds 6172.84 upon conversion.
Now, sell these pounds and purchase NZ $ at the rate :
1 pound = NZ $ 2.95 and receive NZ$ 18209.87
Now, reconvert the above proceeds into US $ at the rate
1 NZ $ = $0.55 i.e sell NZ $ at this rate and receive US $ 10,015.4285
Hence profit from implementing triangular arbitrage is $10,015.43 - $10,000
= $15.43
Arbitrage refers to the prospect of earning a profit by utilizing the mispricing in two different financial markets. An arbitrageur never uses his own funds and always borrows.
Arbitrage works only in the scenario wherein the interest rate purchase parity (IRPT) does not hold good.
The strategy of arbitrage is best explained as "Buy at low price and sell at a high price".
Answer:
Feature fatigue.
Explanation:
Feature fatigue is an inclination for buyers to avoid products that seem, by all accounts, to be feature-rich. It is a cutting edge wonders that has happened because of the blast in the quantity of features stuffed into products and services.
Answer:
For both 10,000 units and 20,000 units, the best alternative is Vendor B
Explanation:
Using the information provided in the question, we can write the following:
Annual Volume of 10,000 units
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 170,000 (we multiply the variable cost per unit by total units)
Fixed costs = 20,000
Total costs = 370,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 140,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 380,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 200,000 (we simply multiply the price by the quantity)
Vendor B
Total cost = 180,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 190,000
The cheapest option is Vendor B
Now for the 20,000 units:
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 340,000
Fixed costs = 200,000
Total costs = 540,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 280,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 520,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 400,000
Vendor B
Total cost = 360,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 380,000
Therefore, Vendor B is once again, the cheapest alternative.
Answer:
The mayor is basically the city's chief executive, Meanwhile the council is the city's primary legislative body if you will. These make up general characteristics of a strong mayor council of governments . Therefore the mayor could or may appoint and remove departmental heads. The mayor can also draft and propose a budget to the city council basically.
