Answer:
Assuming that the elimination of frequent-flyer programs would have enabled the airlines to earn higher profits and remain in business, then it would be a purely good idea for the airlines to eliminate their frequent-flyer programs.
The big question is, how much did the frequent-flyer programs cost the airlines? Would the cost-savings be sufficient to eliminate their bankruptcies? It is a known-fact that the airlines that create such programs always recover the program costs by charging higher fares.
Explanation:
The issue of airlines going bankruptcy does not seem to stem from customer-loyalty programs like the frequent-flyer programs. The root cause lies in operational and other costs that airline managements have not been able to control.
Answer:
Recognize an income/loan repayment of $1,300, and cancel the debt of $200 from the earlier recognition of income
Explanation:
Swan would only recognize an income/loan repayment of $1,300 having already recognized an initial income of $200 of the $1,500 owed before the death of the customer.
Accounting entries would be as follows.
Debit Bank account: $1,500
Credit income/loan repayment account: :1,300
Credit receivables: $200.
The credit of $200 in receivables would be treated as shown above due to the income of $200 already recognised and which would have been treated as follows when it was recognized,
Dr: receivables $200
Cr. interest earned $200,
D. decrease the cost of a high-interest loan
Answer: C. The loss of profit from delayed opening.
Explanation: Tile and Grout failed to execute the job they were contracted and caused water world to delay opening. In business Tile and Grout company will be held liable for failure to execute contract.
Water world can recover the loss of profit from delayed opening due to the failure in the part of Tile and Grout company.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": increase the price level, but not real GDP.
Explanation:
The neutrality of money principle states that fluctuations in the money supply affect the prices of <em>goods, services, </em>and <em>wages</em> but not the growth in an economy or its real Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Austrian economist Friedrich A. Hayek (1899-1992) coined the term "<em>neutrality of money</em>" referring to a characteristic of money playing a neutral role in the growth of an economy.
Nowadays, specialists in the field believe the neutrality of money is a concept that applies in the long-run analysis of the productivity od a country.