Surprisingly, in many ways. However it mostly depends on which country.
I'll give you an overall answer that all countries had in common.
For the most part, there was food regulations and a lot of "support your military" propaganda.
Food was scarce, and the military needed donations.
This also goes as far as bedding, vehicles, and communication devises.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
A is the correct answer
Explanation:
i hope i get this right :P
When a wealthy landowner was given full control over land in the new world, the colonies were known as "proprietary colonies" since these gave the dominating landowners far more control of the lives of the colonists.
The difference lies in interpreting the two sides of the conflict. McPherson saw the war as the war between the evil South and the good North. He was focused on the abolition of slavery and their integration into the society as free people. Horwitz on the other hand saw South not as evil but as a faction which went to war to protect its economic interests.
Answer:
Answer below because its longer :)
Explanation:
When they say "strong groups" they mean factions. These are interest groups basically. The framers of the constitution recognize that factions are inevitable but by creating a stronger central government, we can balance these factions and form a better government.
Remember, the federalists used these papers to support the new constitution. So this instilled some fear about the out comes of a weak central government that the Articles of confederation had.
Hope this is somewhat correct or useful! :D
