Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
Acuatlly it was 3 others that was simular to the new deal program
hope this hellped you very well
The people would respond favorable to a change in leadership if the current government fails to do what they said they would do (the positive things at least), fail to even do the minimum, or the people just don't like the current leader for one reason or another
hope this helps
It was President Harry Truman
