1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ray Of Light [21]
2 years ago
8

Which evidence provides the BEST evidence to support the conclusion that Spanish exploration and settlement had a devastating ef

fect on the Mississippian chiefdoms of the Southeast?
a. During the two centuries following the discovery of the New World, over 90% of the native population were killed by disease and warfare.
History
2 answers:
Monica [59]2 years ago
7 0
"<span>a. During the two centuries following the discovery of the New World, over 90% of the native population were killed by disease and warfare" would be the best option but it should be noted that the 90% figure has been disputed recently.</span>
Orlov [11]2 years ago
6 0

The BEST evidence to support the conclusion that Spanish exploration and settlement had a devastating effect on the Mississippian chiefdoms of the Southeast is that during the two centuries following the discovery of the New World, over 90% of the native population were killed by disease and warfare. The other statements are true regarding the Spanish presence in the region, but answer choice A is most indicative of the "devastating" effects of Spanish colonization. So the answer is A

You might be interested in
Who had a successful revolution in the early nineteenth century?
otez555 [7]

Answer:

A. the french is the correct answer.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Please Help! Just one question: Explain how the Gold Rush helped in the growth and development of California.
katrin [286]
The gold rush helped in growth and development by <span> 

-Leading to a large increase in the population of the territory  </span>
<span>-Promoted the establishment of new shipping routes and railroad lines  
</span><span>-Encouraged the creation of laws and government institutions that helped prepare the territory for statehood  </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I REALLY NEED HELP RIGHT NOW
Bess [88]

Answer:

i dont know

Explanation:

i dont know

3 0
3 years ago
What alternative did Native Americans have to the Second Indian Removal? none going to court set new treaties remain on their la
morpeh [17]

Answer:

NONE is the answer

Explanation:

they had been forced to leave and anything a US citizen was given couldnt be given to them

3 0
3 years ago
After the citizens of Gonzales started shooting make-shift ammunition from the cannon, Castaneda...
deff fn [24]

Answer:The Battle of Gonzales was the first military engagement of the Texas Revolution. It was fought near Gonzales, Texas, on October 2, 1835, between rebellious Texian settlers and a detachment of Mexican army soldiers.

In 1831, Mexican authorities lent the settlers of Gonzales a small cannon to help protect them from frequent Comanche raids. Over the next four years, the political situation in Mexico deteriorated, and in 1835 several states revolted. As the unrest spread, Colonel Domingo de Ugartechea, the commander of all Mexican troops in Texas, felt it unwise to leave the residents of Gonzales with a weapon and requested the return of the cannon.

When the initial request was refused, Ugartechea sent 100 dragoons to retrieve the cannon. The soldiers neared Gonzales on September 29, but the colonists used a variety of excuses to keep them from the town, while secretly sending messengers to request assistance from nearby communities. Within two days, up to 140 Texians gathered in Gonzales, all determined not to give up the cannon. On October 1, settlers voted to initiate a fight. Mexican soldiers opened fire as Texians approached their camp in the early hours of October 2. After several hours of desultory firing, the Mexican soldiers withdrew.[1]

Although the skirmish had little military significance, it marked a clear break between the colonists and the Mexican government and is considered to have been the start of the Texas Revolution. News of the skirmish spread throughout the United States, where it was often referred to as the "Lexington of Texas". The cannon's fate is disputed. It may have been buried and rediscovered in 1936, or it may have been seized by Mexican troops after the Battle of the Alamo.

Explanation:

I hope this helps :)

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • James Oglethorpe helped defend Georgia from an invasion by
    13·1 answer
  • Help me and I hug u and give cookie later :D
    13·2 answers
  • The constitutional amendments passed during Reconstruction A.were viewed as failures for many reasons. B.were designed to protec
    12·2 answers
  • How did the Massachusetts government act change the way Massachusetts was governed
    9·1 answer
  • How did the development of trench warfare influence the course of World War I
    5·1 answer
  • HELP DUE IN 10 MIN!!! I'LL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST
    7·1 answer
  • 13
    15·1 answer
  • Which conclusion about the Portuguese holy office of the inquisition in Brazil is best supported by the passage
    10·1 answer
  • Plz help with this asap
    9·2 answers
  • Who is Anne Frank? <br> Explain in a paragraph, and no copy from website.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!