Answer:
(a) $500
(b) $620
(c) $180
(d) $72
Explanation:
Explicit costs refers to the which are incurred during running the business and these costs affects the profitability of the company.
Implicit costs refers to the opportunity cost of selecting some other alternative.
(a) Here, the explicit cost is the cost of purchasing materials = $500
(b) If I rent an electric saw, then the explicit cost is as follows:
= Purchasing cost of material + (Rent × No. of hours to build ramp)
= $500 + ($20 × 6 )
= $500 + $120
= $620
(c) If I use a handsaw, then the implicit cost is as follows:
= Hours to build ramp × A job pays $12 per hour
= 15 × $12
= $180
(d) If I rent an electric saw, then the implicit cost is as follows:
= Hours to build ramp × A job pays $12 per hour
= 6 × $12
= $72
The primary tool used by the Fed to achieve monetary policy goals is <u>Open Market Operations.</u>
<h3>What are Open Market Operations (OMO)?</h3>
- This refers to the trading of securities by the fed.
- Securities traded include bills, notes, and bonds.
When the fed wants to increase the money supply, they will buy these securities from the public. If it is a decrease they they seek, they will sell securities to the public.
In conclusion, this is Open Market Operations.
Find out more about Open Market Operations at brainly.com/question/14256204.
Answer:
The answer to this question is b. Yours will be positive and your roommate's would be negative.
Explanation:
Income elasticity of demand is the degree of responsiveness of demand to changes in income. In other words, it measures how changes in income of consumers will affect the quantity of commodities demanded by such consumers.
An income elasticity of demand can be positive or negative.
It is positive, when an increase in income leads to an increase in the quantity demanded by the customer. However it is referred to as negative when an increase in income leads to decrease in the quantity demanded by the consumer.
In the question above, it can be seen that the increase in income of the first person brought about increase in the commodity demanded thereby making his income elasticity of demand positive. one the other hand, the increase in the income of his roommate, brought about decrease in his demand which translate to the fact that his income elasticity of demand would be negative.
Hence the answer given.
