<span>by damaging the plant's leaves and changing the chemistry of soils and surface water</span>
Answer:
Plants must have evolved in a manner where they require less water and nutrients as these two were the only limiting factor and carbon dioxide was in abundance
Explanation:
Some 400,000 years ago, the concentration of CO2 was very high and was near to 1000 ppm. At this high concentration of CO2 the photosynthetic activity of plants becomes very high and thus since 400,000 years ago plants could have evolved in an uncontrolled manner but this does not happened. So the reason behind this is limitation in terms of soil and its constituent’s nutrients availability and also limited supply of water.
Therefore, if plants would have evolved themselves in a manner where they require less water and nutrients then they would have grown limitless.
Answer:
The right order is 3, 1, 2.
Explanation:
The most superficial layer is 3, which describes the Cornea. This layer, which is first hit by light, is made of transparent and resistant fabric. It protects the eyeball from trauma and contamination and helps shape the globe and refract light.
Then, the layer described as 1 is the pigmented part that has melanocytes, which may be the uvea that consists of the whole of the iris, choroid membrane and ciliary processes.
Finally, the deepest layer in this question describes the lens, which is a gelatinous biconvex lens. This important structure enables the eye to focus on objects.
They are produced by meiosis
Answer: Meselson & Stahl reasoned that these experiments showed that DNA replication was semi-conservative: the DNA strands separate and each makes a copy of itself, so that each daughter molecule comprises one "old" and one "new" strand. The semi-conservative model, in which each strand of DNA serves as a template to make a new, complementary strand, seemed most likely based on DNA's structure. ... From the patterns of DNA labeling they saw, Meselson and Stahl confirmed that DNA is replicated semi-conservatively.
Explanation: