All categories

3 years ago

At the equilibrium level of income in the Keynesian model, which of the following statements is nottrue?

Business

1 answer:

ZanzabumX [31]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

c. There are more unemployed resources.

Explanation:

Equilibrium level of income is the level of income where aggregate supply in the economy is consistent with aggregate demand. that is the level of income planned savings is equal to planned expenditure. the equation can be written as S = I. where S = savings and I = investments

At equilibrium income level, aggregate expenditure is equal to aggregate output. The equilibrium equation can be written as Y = C+I+G+X-M where

Y = national income, I = investment expenditure of the firm, G = government expenditure on goods and services, X = export, M = import.

You might be interested in

Pharmaceutical Dispensary borrowed $ 630 comma 000 on January 2, 2018, by issuing a 15 % serial bond payable that must be paid

OLga [1]

$273 ,000 being the equal installments for all the three years

Explanation:

I year interest = $ 630,000 ×15÷100 = 94,500

$I year interest = $ 630,000 ×15÷100 = 94,500$

II year interest = $420,000×15÷100 = 63,000

$II year interest = $420,000×15÷100 = 63,000$

III year interest = $210 ,000×15÷100 = 31,500

$III year interest = $210 ,000×15÷100 = 31,500$

Total interest = 94,500+63,000+31,500 = 189.000

$Total interest = 94,500+63,000+31,500 = 189.000$

Installments payment with interest for each year is=

(630,000 + 189,000 = 819,000÷ 3 = 273,000)

$(630,000 + 189,000 = 819,000÷ 3 = 273,000)$

= $273 ,000 being the equal installments for all the three years

6 0

4 years ago

You view tea and scones as perfect complements, and you prefer to consumer one cup of tea with one scone. Also, your indifferenc

vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

Infinity

Explanation:

In the case when the tea and scones are considered to be the perfect complements also you give preference one cup of tea over the one scone

Plus the indifferent curve with tea should be plotted on the vertical axis

So in the case when there is 2 cups of tea with one scone so at this point, the MRS should be at infinity as the indifference curve should be in downward sloping because we presume that there is preferences done at monotonicity

8 0

3 years ago

Consider the following cash flows of two projects for Fontana Rubber Parts Company. Assume the discount rate for Fontana Rubber

marta [7]

Answer:

Year Dry Prepreg discounted cash flow

0 -$30,000 -$30,000

1 10,000 8,772

2 10,000 7,695

3 10,000 6,750

4 10,000 5,921

5 10,000 5,194

Year Solvent Prepreg. discounted cash flow

0 -$90,000 -$90,000

1 28,000 24,561

2 28,000 21,545

3 28,000 18,899

4 28,000 16,578

5 28,000 14,542

a. Calculate NPV, IRR, MIRR, payback, and discounted payback for each project

Dry Prepreg

NPV = $4,330

IRR = 19.86%

MIRR = 17.12%

payback = 3 years

discounted payback = 4.17 years

Solvent Prepreg

NPV = $6,130

IRR = 16.80%

MIRR = 15.51%

payback = 3.21 years

discounted payback = 4.58 years

b. Assuming the projects are independent, which one(s) would you recommend?

both projects, since their NPV is positive

c. If the projects are mutually exclusive, which would you recommend?

Dry prepreg becuase its IRR, MIRR are higher, and its payback and discounted payback periods are shorter.

7 0

3 years ago

Key comparative figures for Apple and Google follow.

kow [346]

Answer:

1. <u>Apple</u>

Current year Days sales uncollected = Account receivables/Net sales * 365

= 15754 / 215639 * 365 = 27 days

= 16849 / 233715 * 365 = 26 days

<u>Google</u>

Current year Days sales uncollected = Account receivables/Net sales * 365

= 14137 / 90272 * 365 = 57 days

Prior years Days sales uncollected = Account receivables/Net sales * 365

= 11556 / 74989 * 365 = 56 days

2. Base on the computation above, Apple had more success collecting receivables.

7 0

3 years ago

An) _____ is a simple project management planning tool used to break the project plan into smaller and smaller steps.

GrogVix [38]

Answer:

WBS

Explanation:

Work breakdown structure

6 0

2 years ago