1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna [14]
3 years ago
12

During the history of the presidency, most arguments over candidacy qualifications have revolved around the __________ qualifica

tion.
History
2 answers:
Hoochie [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Citizenship

Explanation: People have tried to say that candidates were not born in the US and therefor do not meet the natural born citizen clause.

frutty [35]3 years ago
6 0
During the history of the presidency, most arguments over candidacy qualifications have revolved around the "native born" qualification, especially during the most recent election. 
You might be interested in
Which of the following is true about the election of 1800?
Anit [1.1K]
<span>A tie in the electoral college sent the election to the House of Representatives.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Defend recall as an example of clvic participation
DiKsa [7]

Answer:Civic engagement or civic participation is any individual or group activity addressing issues of public concern

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
How have international aid report template to combat the global water crisis
Shalnov [3]

Educate to change consumption and lifestyles. ...

Invent new water conservation technologies. ...

Recycle wastewater. ...

Improve irrigation and agricultural practices. ...

Appropriately price water. ...

Develop energy efficient desalination plants.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was a benefit of the Sumerian writing system?
Rashid [163]

Answer:

The 3rd one

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.

The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about common law is true?
    14·2 answers
  • What were the three main agricultural crops that Eastern Woodlands tribes like the Catawba, Cherokee, and Yemassee relied upon?
    14·2 answers
  • How do most people make their opinions known to government officials?
    10·1 answer
  • Followed the Hitler's lead in his adoption of anti-Semitic views A. Adolf Hitler B. Benito Mussolini C. Josef Stalin
    11·2 answers
  • Categorize the locations based on whether they were sites of Allied or Japanese victories.
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement describes one of the central trends in the transition from the First to the Second Industrial Revolution in the
    15·2 answers
  • What Countries Have limited and unlimited governments?
    9·2 answers
  • Which religious leader who trained as a carpenter taught that the kingdom of God was one of faith?
    15·2 answers
  • Which nation was led by the dictator Mussolini?
    5·2 answers
  • What are the foundational principles of a democratic system of government?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!