The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there no options attached or any specific reading, we can say the following.
The key ideals and provisions of the tribal treaties of this era (such as the Point No Point Treaty), were the displacement of the Native American Indians tribes from their territories to support white settlement, as was the case of the Point No Point Treaty that was signed on January 26, 1855.
Let'set this case as an example. Isaac Stevens was the Governor of the Washington territory. He wanted the land of the Kitsap Peninsula. So he had to negotiate a deal with three different tribes; the Skokomish, the S'Klallam, and the Chimakum. The Native American Indian tribe's leaders expressed their concerns and were reluctant to accept. Stevens had to give them a reservation with fishing and hunting rights, where they could grow crops and live with their families, in exchange for that Kitsap territory.
That it's not gonna be around any longer
Answer:
english? maybe i could help u
Explanation:
The Song Dynasty practiced Buddhism whereas the Tang banned the religion and persecuted those who followed it during the later time of their ruling. The Tang Dynasty also had expanded their empire and even reformed civil service. The Tang expanded and conserved their power by establishing tributary states. They had a stronger more powerful military when compared to the Song. The Song Dynasty ruled a smaller empire during their time that primarily relied on sea power. Their military power was weaker than what the Tang Dynasty’s was.
Explanation:
programs aimed at reducing poverty levels in the city
