1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fiasKO [112]
3 years ago
6

Which option most accurately analyzes the role of Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson in the Civil War?

History
2 answers:
netineya [11]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson was one of General Lee’s most trusted generals; he was accidentally shot by his own troops at the Battle of Chancellorsville.

Explanation:

When the Civil War arrived, Thomas Jackson was a colonel of the Virginia militia, and was stationed at Harpers Ferry until J.E. Johnston replaced him.

Jackson excelled in the first battle of Bull Run in 1861 (where he received his famous nickname Stonewall), after which he was promoted to general on October 7 of that same year and was given command of the Valley District, with headquarters in Winchester (Virginia), where he defeated Union troops, far superior to his own.  He also had a prominent role in the second battle of Bull Run, Antietam and Fredericksburg.

On May 2, 1863, during the victorious Battle of Chancellorsville, Jackson went on a night reconnaissance mission and was shot by his own men, who because of the darkness did not recognize him.

alisha [4.7K]3 years ago
6 0

<u>Answer: </u><u>He was one of General Lee’s most trusted generals; he was accidentally shot by his own troops at the Battle of Chancellorsville.</u>


This one is true because he was shot by his own men at Chancellorsville, none of the other answers satisfies this

You might be interested in
Do you think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it? Why or why not?
Vlada [557]
This is a matter of opinion.  Do YOU think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it?  Let's look at the factors.

What were some of the positives?  Well, firstly, it ended World War II.  That's kind of a big deal.  In fact, it caused Japan not only to surrender, but UNCONDITIONALLY surrender.  Basically, that means the US could ask Japan to do whatever it liked--which the US liked!  Secondly, it was a triumph of science.  The atomic bomb was a revolutionary work of science.  Nothing like it had ever been made before, and it was all based on secrecy and theoretical science.  The atomic bomb also <span>provided the basis for new, improved weapons, including the hydrogen bomb.  </span>Thirdly, it helped establish the United States as a world power.  Knowing about this super powerful weapon the US had, countries were likely to back off!  

But there's a lot of negatives here, too.  Keep in mind that most of these benefits were for the United States alone.  Of course, there was one other BIG negative for the United States, and that's cost.  The atomic bomb was worth billions of dollars!  A second big one wasn't so much for the United States as for the world, especially Japan.  When the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the effects on the people and city were devastating.  People were vaporized.  Cities and buildings were flattened, and nothing is left but carnage.  People died, their skin peeling off, from cancer and radiation.  It was awful!  Thirdly, it caused the arms race.  Knowing the US had this super weapon, ALL the countries started building their own.  Now, we pretty much live in fear of all the nuclear weapons there are today--which are hundreds of times more powerful each than the first bomb!

So what do you think?  Was it worth it?
6 0
4 years ago
Who determines what will be taught in Colorado schools?
stich3 [128]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the Jim Crow Laws for restaurants in Georgia and Alabama, and then answer the question.
Julli [10]

Answer:

check 1 and 2.....…...........

3 0
3 years ago
Do you think the word transitional is a
uysha [10]

Answer:

A transitional fossil is a term used to describe a fossil that shows a transitional form of two different species.As the theory states that organisms have gradually changed from one from to another form transitional fossils should be found that show evidence of the transitional forms of the organism.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following are considered customs and traditions of the United States government even though they are not formally m
hjlf

Answer:

C.

I did the test and got a 100%

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The presidency is awarded to the candidate who wins
    9·1 answer
  • After the foundation of the temple had been laid, how many years passed before the work was continued?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the most likely purpose for including the statement at the top of the document? to ensure that Ozamoto travels only to C
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following Americans worked with the United Nations and helped write the United Declaration of Human Rights?
    10·2 answers
  • In Louisiana, a “county” is referred to as a “borough”.<br> True or False
    7·1 answer
  • What places did hernan cortes explore in america
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Battle of Velasco end?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the United States military surprised by the Tet Offensive?
    5·1 answer
  • What role did the NAACP play in the early civil rights movement?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the English Bill of Rights?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!