The sentence has a vague pronoun problem because it is unclear if the police officer or the criminal tripped and fell. In order to correct this, the sentence needs to be more specific. We can say any of the following sentences:
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>the officer </u>tripped and fell.
- It is clear that the officer fell.
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>the criminal </u>tripped and fell.
- It is clear the criminal fell.
This sentence wouldn't necessarily work with the original sentence since we can infer that only one of them fell because the writer used he. However, if both of them fell, it would be correct as well.
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>they</u> tripped and fell.
Alike because its comparing to something that has similar properties
Focusing on Passepartout’s perspective makes the story
objective. Passepartout doesn’t have a personal bias or have anything to prove
so he doesn't react impulsively or affectionately. (Greenleafable,
Brainly)“Being much less cool-headed than Mr. Fogg, he was
much more restless, counting and recounting the days passed over, uttering
maledictions when the train stopped, and accusing it of sluggishness, and
mentally blaming Mr. Fogg for not having bribed the engineer. The worthy fellow
was ignorant that, while it was possible by such means to hasten the rate of a
steamer, it could not be done on the railway.” This is a quote showing that the
narrator is telling the story from third person, not Passepartou from first, thus giving the story a more real and relatable aspect to it.
Deprecating means disapproving.
If you need to determine the subject of this sentence, that would be Dorothy Parker and E.B. White.
However, this isn't a simple subject, because there are two people involved. This is why this is called a complete subject.
