Answer:
B. Henry Taylor's article keeps saying that Victor Hugo was against
Napoleon, but he never backs it up.
Explanation:
A credible source is an information source that is unbiased, trustworthy and reliable. Also, a credible source is typically backed up by evidence from various information channels and should be accurate.
In order to validate a credible source, it is necessary to ensure that the information provided is checked against other reliable sources to verify its level of accuracy.
As a rule, any credible information source should have multiple ways to validate the informations being presented i.e it should be factually backed up with evidence.
In a group discussion, the best example of challenging the credibility of a source would be; Henry Taylor's article keeps saying that Victor Hugo was against Napoleon, but he never backs it up. Henry's article isn't credible because it isn't backed up with any evidence or source to validate the claim that Victor Hugo was against Napoleon.
Answer:
no i don't, is it a story and questions i can help w tht lol
Explanation:
Succulent herbed boneless pork loin chops paired with a tangy raspberry sauce.
Did I get it right?
Answer:
a moral lesson, im highly guessing
