1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pickupchik [31]
2 years ago
5

Look at the following short outline for an explanatory essay. What is wrong with it?

English
2 answers:
AnnZ [28]2 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B. The section about the Inca Empire needs to address cultural developments

Explanation:

An outline is a summary of the contents that will be included in a text and that are connected to the main claim or thesis statement, which is the position of the author in relation to some topic or subject and which guides the contents of a text or essay. Considering this, the main claim or thesis statement of this explanatory essay outline is that the Aztec Empire achieved more developments than the Inca Empire in terms of government, society, and culture. Due to this, the outline should include the developments of both the Incas and the Aztecs in government, society, and culture, in this way the author can show there were more developments or more significant developments in the Aztec Empire. However, the outline presented does not include the cultural developments for the Inca Empire and thus, the information is incomplete or wrong as this information is necessary for the essay and cannot be ommited.

BabaBlast [244]2 years ago
3 0
The answer would be B, since the cultural developments are addressed in the Aztec section but not the Inca section. Hope that helped!
You might be interested in
A land developer, Sandy Burns, is planning to build a very large housing development near a lake that is used for fishing and sw
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

hello, miss/mr sandy burns, it may seem like your planning to build a very lard housing development near a lake that's used for fishing and swimming, i think what your doing is a great idea, but what would happen if the lake goes bad like, it has gutter, plastic, bags, etc, and it could cause alot of bacteria, so can you maybe think twice about this?

8 0
2 years ago
Which is a standard feature of young adult novels?
sasho [114]

Answer:

its d

Explanation:

themes related to forming identity

5 0
3 years ago
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Nitella [24]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube

Kalani’s Argument:  My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.

Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).

Which argument is more convincing?

Answer:

Kalani's argument is more convincing.

Explanation:

Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.

7 0
2 years ago
Write a detailed note on pre-writing techniques.
Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

Key Points

1. Freewriting is writing without editing in order to get your ideas flowing.

2. Freewriting can be a useful prewriting technique to help think of different directions your paper can take.

3. To freewrite, get a pen and paper (or open up a blank computer document) and set yourself a time

3 0
2 years ago
Statistically, it is proven that the most dangerous, ____ risk years of your driving career are the first years.
iren2701 [21]
Statistically, it is proven that the most dangerous, ____ risk years of your driving career are the first years.     <span>A. high</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • We wrote in our journals for twenty minutes each day. Which type of clause or phrase does the sentence have? A-adjectival clause
    11·1 answer
  • Help pez pez pe z pez pez pez pez
    6·2 answers
  • Which sentence segment contains a punctuation error?
    14·1 answer
  • QUICK PLZ
    10·1 answer
  • Why had "Island of the Blue Dolphin won so many awards?
    15·2 answers
  • Help me make a lead-in for this body paragraph
    10·1 answer
  • _____ means that managers try to take a rational approach to decision making but are restricted by real-world constraints, incom
    15·1 answer
  • Write your plans when you complete school
    14·2 answers
  • Hello this is a quetion are yall enjoying the app
    6·1 answer
  • Identify which type of hook is used in this introduction paragraph to
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!