1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natali [406]
3 years ago
9

According to mill what is the principle of utility​

History
1 answer:
zhenek [66]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The principle of utility states that actions or behaviors are right in so far as they promote happiness or pleasure, wrong as they tend to produce unhappiness or pain.

Explanation:

When I first heard this and then i went and asked my college professor and this is what she said...

You might be interested in
Did Hitler kill himself? or is that a myth?
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

he did, yes. Apparently with a gun.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the role of the Committees of Correspondence which formed in the year before the
zmey [24]

D. The committees promoted the policies of the British govemment.​

7 0
2 years ago
What branch of the government contains Congress, which creates laws?
ad-work [718]

Answer:

The legislative branch contains Congress and creates laws

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did life change for Christians after the Edict of Milan? Christians elected their own senators. Christians were now free to
alex41 [277]

Answer:

Christians were now free to worship without fear.

Explanation:

Edict of Milan was granted in 313 AD by Constantine. The purpose is to alow the restoration of Churches lost by the Christians during the period of persecution and provide them the freedom and safety to worship their God according to their religion practices, inside the Empire.

Hence, the correct answer in his case is "Christians were now free to worship without fear."

6 0
3 years ago
Why would an interpretation of a historical event change over time? Check all that apply.
vlabodo [156]

New evidence is discovered & Oversights and errors are corrected

Thats what i personally think because new opinions have to be backed with evidence, while if a piece of evidence is lost or stolen, it doesn't change the arguments because even though it is lost or stolen, there ought to be copies of the original object, but im not sure about new technology being applied to evidence, but it can go either or, its a 50/50 because new technology can enhance historical discoveries, or find new ones, but applying new technology as evidence has to be backed up with facts as to why it should be applied

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the main idea of this news article
    12·1 answer
  • Why do so many trade routes run along waterways?
    6·2 answers
  • Who are the philoffsifers (idek how to spell )
    14·1 answer
  • I need help with my 7th grade civics.
    11·1 answer
  • My black face fades,
    10·1 answer
  • Why did some slave traders operate illegally, even before the slave trade was outlawed by many nations?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best describes the spread of communism in the years immediately following WWII
    13·1 answer
  • How many states have over 300 amendments to their constitution?<br> 2<br> 4 <br> 8
    8·1 answer
  • In the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka case (1954), the Supreme Court ruled that it is illegal to force people of differen
    11·1 answer
  • What was the focus of the NAACP's fight in the 1930s?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!