1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kaylis [27]
3 years ago
6

What new technologies and industries appeared between 1850 and 1900, and how did they affect the world economy?

History
1 answer:
Nady [450]3 years ago
8 0
Electricity, steel, chemical industries, railroads, steamships, telegraph, textile mills, nitroglycerin and dynamite and submarine telegraphs cables. They revolutionized everyday life and transformed the economy. Electricity increases production and makes safer cities.
You might be interested in
John was one of the "inner circle" of Christ's disciples, along with: Paul and Timothy Nathanael and Andrew Luke and Theophilus
Serhud [2]

John was one of the "inner circle" of Christ's disciples, along with:

<u><em>James and peter </em></u>

<h3><em>Inner circle of disciples went up to mount of transfiguration;  Went with Jesus and fell asleep while Jesus prayed : (Peter, James, and John)</em></h3><h3><u><em>After six days Jesus took with him Peter, James and John the brother of James, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. _(Matthew 17:1 )</em></u></h3>
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was president carters response to the soviet unions invasion of Afghanistan in 1979
Aliun [14]
I come to you this evening to discuss the extremely important and rapidly changing circumstances in Southwest Asia. . . .

. . . Massive Soviet military forces have invaded the small, nonaligned, sovereign nation of Afghanistan, which had hitherto not been an occupied satellite of the Soviet Union.

Fifty thousand heavily armed Soviet troops have crossed the border and are now dispersed throughout Afghanistan, attempting to conquer the fiercely independent Muslim people of that country.

The Soviets claim, falsely, that they were invited into Afghanistan to help protect that country from some unnamed outside threat. But the President, who had been the leader of Afghanistan before the Soviet invasion, was assassinated – along with several members of his family – after the Soviets gained control of the capital city of Kabul. Only several days later was the new puppet leader even brought into Afghanistan by the Soviets.

This invasion is an extremely serious threat to peace because of the threat of further Soviet expansion into neighboring countries in Southwest Asia and also because such an aggressive military policy is unsettling to other peoples throughout the world.

This is a callous violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. It is a deliberate effort of a powerful atheistic government to subjugate an independent Islamic people.

We must recognize the strategic importance of Afghanistan to stability and peace. A Soviet-occupied Afghanistan threatens both Iran and Pakistan and is a steppingstone to possible control over much of the world’s oil supplies.

The United States wants all nations in the region to be free and to be independent. If the Soviets are encouraged in this invasion by eventual success, and if they maintain their dominance over Afghanistan and then extend their control to adjacent countries, the stable, strategic, and peaceful balance of the entire world will be changed. This would threaten the security of all nations including, of course, the United States, our allies, and our friends.

Therefore, the world simply cannot stand by and permit the Soviet Union to commit this act with impunity. Fifty nations have petitioned the United Nations Security Council to condemn the Soviet Union and to demand the immediate withdrawal of all Soviet troops from Afghanistan.

. . . [N]either the United States nor any other nation which is committed to world peace and stability can continue to do business as usual with the Soviet Union.

I have already recalled the United States Ambassador from Moscow back to Washington. He’s working with me and with my other senior advisers in an immediate and comprehensive evaluation of the whole range of our relations with the Soviet Union.

The successful negotiation of the SALT II treaty1 has been a major goal and a major achievement of this administration, and we Americans, the people of the Soviet Union, and indeed the entire world will benefit from the successful control of strategic nuclear weapons through the implementation of this carefully negotiated treaty.

However, because of the Soviet aggression, I have asked the United States Senate to defer further consideration of the SALT II treaty so that the Congress and I can assess Soviet actions and intentions and devote our primary attention to the legislative and other measures required to respond to this crisis. As circumstances change in the future, we will, of course, keep the ratification of SALT II under active review in consultation with the leaders of the Senate.

The Soviets must understand our deep concern. We will delay opening of any new American or Soviet consular facilities, and most of the cultural and economic exchanges currently under consideration will be deferred. Trade with the Soviet Union will be severely restricted. . . .

Along with other countries, we will provide military equipment, food, and other assistance to help Pakistan defend its independence and its national security against the seriously increased threat it now faces from the north. The United States also stands ready to help other nations in the region in similar ways.

Neither our allies nor our potential adversaries should have the slightest doubt about our willingness, our determination, and our capacity to take the measures I have outlined tonight. I have consulted with leaders of the Congress, and I am confident they will support legislation that may be required to carry out these measures.

History teaches, perhaps, very few clear lessons. But surely one such lesson learned by the world at great cost is that aggression, unopposed, becomes a contagious disease. . . .
8 0
3 years ago
What decisions did caesar make?
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

Caesar's choice to return to Italy after his years away in Gaul despite the fact that doing so would provoke a civil war.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Spanish conquistadors in the new world sought.
Alika [10]

Answer:

3.Adventures and wealth

7 0
3 years ago
Is the union shop illegal in right to work states? Explain
Cloud [144]
<span>t in no state must you join a union. It is legal in the non-right to work states to require an employee to pay a portion of the required union dues which are attributed to contract negotiation and enforcement. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did WW2 started? Why, and Where
    12·1 answer
  • How was World War One differ from previous wars
    15·2 answers
  • Progressives supported action against companies when companies
    11·2 answers
  • The most effective way for both houses of Congress to prevent the president from following a particular foreign policy would be
    14·2 answers
  • According to the lesson, what two events helped to redefine the social and economic characteristics of America during the latter
    11·2 answers
  • HEEEELPPPP PLEAAASE!
    15·1 answer
  • &amp; True or False During the Enlightenment, the power of human reason was<br> valued
    7·2 answers
  • Why do both India and Pakistan believe control of Kashmir is so important?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT considered to be a cause of the GreatDepression?
    10·2 answers
  • The Minoan civilians developed:
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!