1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
USPshnik [31]
3 years ago
12

As the tribe divided over voluntary removal, which two Cherokee emerged as leaders of opposite viewpoints? A. Stand Waitie and M

ajor Ridge B. Elias Boudinot and John Ridge C. Oceola and Dancing Rabbit D. Major Ridge and John Ross
History
2 answers:
Mrac [35]3 years ago
7 0
D. Major Ridge and John Ross
SpyIntel [72]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D. Major Ridge and John Ross

Explanation:

The cheeroke removal is what we know the process by which the Cherokee nations were forced to re-locate into the indian territory on the state of Oklahoma, they were relocated from states like Texas, Alabama, Georgia, the Carolinas and Tennessee, there were two factions to thsi matter, the faction that supported the relocation treaty led by Major Ridge, and the faction that opposed the treaty and the relocation led by John Ross.

You might be interested in
What was the main effect of entrepreneurship in China?
just olya [345]

Answer:

The first option

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What two pieces of legislation were passed in 1916 to would help prepare america for war
almond37 [142]
The preparedness campaign and the the national defense act
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not true of both ancient Chinese and ancient Indian society and government?
trapecia [35]

Answer:

Can you provide us with the choices? It says: "Which of the following... ."

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why did germaniac flock to the roman empire in the late 300?
AlexFokin [52]
They were trying to seek refuge from the huns
8 0
4 years ago
Why is the Constitution a Supreme Law of the Land?
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer: since the constitution is the supreme law of the land those laws.cannot be valid and must be overturned. The constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land meaning that no law can be legal if it contradicts what the constitution says. Hope this helps.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. which monarch continued to allow serfs? a) catherine the great b) frederick william ii c) charles v (spain) d) peter the grea
    9·2 answers
  • Question 6
    10·1 answer
  • How should american policy makers err in liberty v equality when there two american principles collide?
    7·1 answer
  • in a paragraph, evaluate the social changes women experienced on the home front as a result of World War I. Discuss both the har
    15·2 answers
  • The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide the issue of slavery by popular sovereignty. Th
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these most closely describes the Puritans?
    12·1 answer
  • The Mayan kings wanted to appease their gods and still remain autonomous (self-governing). How is this different than other civi
    6·2 answers
  • What does the light color on the map mean
    6·1 answer
  • Can you think of an accusation today that would cause the same level of fear as communism??
    5·1 answer
  • Refer to one or more details in the text to explain how Rosa’s previous interaction with the bus driver may have contributed to
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!