1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRissso [65]
3 years ago
7

Do you believe a Supreme Court nominee should be named this year or do you believe the Senate should wait until the results of t

he 2020 election are known? Why do you believe this?  ​
History
1 answer:
spin [16.1K]3 years ago
5 0

This question is based on your opinion.

For example:

Yes. I believe a Supreme Court nominee should be named this year because  throughout history, presidents have nominated Supreme Court candidates regardless of whether it was an election year, including Brandeis, whose nomination was confirmed in June 1916.

OR

No. I believe the Senate should wait until the results of the 2020 election, because the choosing of a new Supreme Court nominee is too close to the election and it should be up to the new president to make the final decision. The new president will be in office for the next 4 years, and that is when the new nominee should be decided.

You might be interested in
Which of the following BEST summarizes the overall disagreement between the federalist and anti-federalists?
ivolga24 [154]

You didn't provide us with choices, so I'll simply provide some historical explanation.  The main issue was whether the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights added.

The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states.  Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA.  They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

Federalists believed the Constitution itself clearly limited government power and protected the rights of the people.  Nevertheless, the addition of a Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided  reassurance to Anti-Federalists in the fight over ratification.  The compromise which led to agreement in regard to ratification of the Constitution was called the Massachusetts Compromise, because of major opposition to ratification that had existed in Massachusetts.  John Hancock and Samuel Adams (both of them anti-Federalists) were the ones who helped negotiate the compromise. The anti-Federalists agreed that they would support ratification of the Constitution, with the understanding that recommendations for amendments would follow if the Constitution was ratified.  The Federalists promised to support the proposed amendments, which would outline a Bill of Rights to guarantee protection of specific rights the anti-Federalists wanted specifically asserted in the Constitution.  

The US Constitution was ratified in 1788.  The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.

4 0
3 years ago
Match each phrase with its correct nongovernmental organization.
vampirchik [111]

Answer: red cross- takes blood donations, provides humanitarian efforts, provides medical attention, protects victims of armed conflicts. amnesty international- works to stop refugee exploitation, protects human rights, protects against human trafficking, advocates for arms control.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Prior to the outbreak of WWll, we can see authoritarian governments on the rise. Think like a historian for a moment: what might
Eduardwww [97]

Answer: The answer is given below in 2-4 sentences.

The authoritarian governments means a government which consumes the central power strongly and there is less freedom to political choice, less freedom to the press and strong nationalism ,opposed to liberalism. Prior to the outbreak of WWII there were several authoritarian governments raised in the Europe and Asia. There was Hitler government in Germany, Mussolini Government in Italy,Joseph Stalin in Soviet Union, emperor of Japan. All of these authoritarian governments were at the peak of their time before the WWII and ruled their country with their hard principal.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Question 7 of 15
Tomtit [17]
I would say D is the correct answer.
5 0
2 years ago
Governments enforce laws in order to
victus00 [196]

Answer:

keep peace and order. They enforce laws to prevent anarchy

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country failed to join the newly created league of nations after the war ended? france united states italy great britain d
    6·1 answer
  • What sparked the English Civil war in the 1600s
    12·2 answers
  • What do the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Amendments guarantee for citizens?
    9·1 answer
  • We cannot call the statement "There are 54 states in the United States" an opinion because _____.
    5·2 answers
  • To what major trade region did the united states aim for while developing a larger navy?
    11·1 answer
  • What states did the confederate troops attempt invasions on the North
    14·2 answers
  • Why was the union’s capture of Vicksburg a turning point in the civil war?
    11·1 answer
  • What were the Soviets and Americans racing to develop in the 1950s?
    7·1 answer
  • Theodore Roosevelt was a member of the
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!