Answer:
The protest in China was not successful because of lack of support by the people and the brutal response from the government.
Explanation:
The Tiananmen Square pretests are known all over the world, unfortunately not because of good reasons. While these protests were very inspiring for the people in the neighboring countries of China and led to success when it came to the demands of the people, that was not the case in China.
The reasons why it was not successful in China are that when compared to the population of the country, it was actually very few people that were protesting, while the majority didn't offered support and were standing behind the government. Also, the government was very quick and brutal in its reaction, sending the military and tanks to destroy the protests, and it was very effective. Not just that the protests were destroyed, but also the people that maybe wanted to support them were terrified to death and didn't dear because of the consequences.
In general, these bankers and businessmen often demand from their mother countries "<span>B. protection and support" which was needed to defend against angry natives</span>
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, I do believe that the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights. Though the wording of the sentence above may sound like I'm saying I believe the government is allowed to control people, that's the last thing I mean. People need rules and structure which is what the government provides. Imagine if there <em>wasn't</em> a government. There would be no soical order because people will have too much power and some will not use their civil liberties responsibly. I understand both sides, but overall, I do think the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights.
<span> a traditional scandinavian story form called SAGAS.</span>