1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergiy2304 [10]
4 years ago
14

Sheffield Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution.

Fields does not manufacture or sell the products and processes it develops. Instead, it conducts research and develops products and processes which it patents, and then assigns the patents to manufacturers on a royalty basis. Occasionally it sells a patent. The history of Fields patent number 758-6002-1A is as follows.
Date
Activity
Cost
2008–2009 Research conducted to develop precipitator $382,000
Jan. 2010 Design and construction of a prototype 89,000
March 2010 Testing of models 40,600
Jan. 2011 Fees paid engineers and lawyers to prepare patent application;
patent granted June 30, 2011 52,700
Nov. 2012 Engineering activity necessary to advance the design of the
precipitator to the manufacturing stage 84,500
Dec. 2013 Legal fees paid to successfully defend precipitator patent 40,600
April 2014 Research aimed at modifying the design of the patented precipitator 41,600
July 2018 Legal fees paid in unsuccessful patent infringement suit against a
competitor 36,000

Fields assumed a useful life of 17 years when it received the initial precipitator patent. On January 1, 2016, it revised its useful life estimate downward to 5 remaining years. Amortization is computed for a full year if the cost is incurred prior to July 1, and no amortization for the year if the cost is incurred after June 30. The company’s year ends December 31.

Compute the carrying value of patent No. 758-6002-1A on each of the following dates:

(a) December 31, 2011
$
(b) December 31, 2015
$
(c) December 31, 2018
$
Business
1 answer:
vlabodo [156]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

                        SHEFFIELD LABORATORY

                            PATENT (NO. 78-6002-1A)

Carrying value as at Dec 31

                                      2011                     2015                   2018

Cost                            $182,300           $349,000           $385,000

Amortization             <u> (10,724)   </u>             <u>(79,433)  </u>           <u>(142,403)</u>

                                 <u> 171,576     </u>         <u>   269,567  </u>           <u>242,597</u>

Cost

As at 31 Dec 2011

Design and construction of a prototype                                     $89,000

Testing of models                                                                           40,600

Fees paid engineers and lawyers to prepare application          <u> 52,700</u>

                                                                                                       <u>$182,300</u>

As at 31 Dec 2012

Cost as at Jan 1, 2012                                                                $182,300

Additional cost during the year:

Engineering activity necessary to advance.                           <u> $84,500  </u>

                                                                                                    <u>$266,800</u>

As at 31 Dec 2013

Cost as at Jan 1, 2013                                                                $266,800

Additional cost during the year:

legal fee paid                                                                              <u>$40600  </u>

                                                                                                 <u>   $307,400</u>

As at 31 Dec 2014

Cost as at Jan 1, 2013                                                                $307,400

Additional cost during the year:

Research aimed at modifying the design                                <u>$41,600 </u>

                                                                                                   <u> $349,000</u>

As at 31 Dec 2018

Cost as at Jan 1, 2018                                                                $349,000

Additional cost during the year:

legal fee paid in unseccesful patent infrigement.                   <u>  $36,000  </u>

                                                                                                    <u>$385,000</u>

Amortization for the year    

Dec 31 2011         $182,300/17 =  $10,724

Dec 31 2012

182,300/17                                          10,724

84,500/0                                          <u>      -       </u>

                                                         <u>  10,724</u>

<u />

Dec 31 , 2013 :

  $182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/0     =     <u>    -  </u>

                         <u>   16,005</u>

Dec 31 2014  =  

$182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/16     =       2,538

41,600/17      =       <u> 2,447</u>

                         <u>   20,990</u>

Dec 31 2018  =  

$182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/16     =       2,538

41,600/17      =        2,447

36,000/0     =    <u>       -</u>

                         <u>   20,990</u>

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Eric and Chris run a non-regulated natural monopoly producing electricity for a small town. The barrier most likely preventing o
alexdok [17]

Answer:

increasing returns to scale

Explanation:

The biggest barrier for other firms are increasing returns to scale. This is because Eric and Chris have their company already established and also have their clientele all hooked up and using their service. This allows them to produce a much higher electrical output for their clients with a certain Income. Newer companies will need a much higher income just to be able to produce a similar electrical output in order to try and compete with Eric and Chris.

5 0
3 years ago
Elizabeth is a chef and the kitchen manager in an upscale restaurant. she is very knowledgeable in both the culinary and restaur
allsm [11]

Because she possesses these technical skills, Elizabeth can be considered a <u>"knowledge"</u> worker.


A knowledge worker is any individual who works professionally at the errands of creating or utilizing knowledge. For instance, a knowledge laborer may be somebody who works at any of the assignments of arranging, obtaining, looking, breaking down, sorting out, putting away, programming, dispersing, advertising, or generally adding to the change and business of data and those (frequently similar individuals) who work at utilizing the information so created.  

Knowledge work can be separated from different types of work by its accentuation on "non-schedule" critical thinking that requires a mix of concurrent and unique thinking. Yet in spite of the measure of research and writing on information work, there is no brief meaning of the term.

7 0
3 years ago
In the short run, if average variable cost equals $50, average total cost equals $75, and output equals 100, the total fixed cos
musickatia [10]

Answer: $2500

Explanation:

From the question,

Average variable cost(AVC) = $50

Average total cost (ATC) = $75

Output (Q) = 100

Since Average fixed cost is the difference between the average total cost and the average Variable cost. This will be:

AFC = ATC - AVC

AFC = $75 - $50

AFC = $25

We should note that:

AFC = TFC / Q

TFC = AFC × Q

TFC = $25 × 100

TFC = $2500

Therefore, total fixed cost is $2500

5 0
3 years ago
Marilyn has a biweekly gross pay of $810 and claims 3 federal withholding allowances. Marilyn has all of the following deduction
frutty [35]

The net pay of Marilyn will increase by $18.15 due to the increase in the federal withholding allowances from 3 to 4.

<h3>The computation of net pay considering various federal withholding allowances</h3>

Given,

Gross pay =$810

3 Federal withholding allowances =$37 (taken from the reference table)

4 Federal withholding allowances =$22 (taken from the reference table)

Federal state tax rate =21%

First, the state tax rate and the total amount of withholding for 3 Federal withholding allowances are computed:

\begin{aligned}\text{State Tax}&=\text{Claim Amount}\times\text{Federal State Tax Rate}\\&=\$37\times21\%\\&=\$7.77\end{aligned}

\begin{aligned}\text{Total Amount of 3 withholdings}&=\text{Claim Amount}+\text{State Tax}\\&=\$37+\$7.77\\&=\$44.77\end{aligned}

Now, the state tax rate and the total amount of withholding for 4 Federal withholding allowances are computed:

\begin{aligned}\text{State Tax}&=\text{Claim Amount}\times\text{Federal State Tax Rate}\\&=\$22\times21\%\\&=\$4.62\end{aligned}

\begin{aligned}\text{Total Amount of 4 withholdings}&=\text{Claim Amount}+\text{State Tax}\\&=\$22+\$4.62\\&=\$26.62\end{aligned}

The difference in the net pay will be the difference between $44.77 and $26.62, which is $18.15.

Therefore, Marilyn withholding will decrease from $44.77 to $26.62 that is increasing the net pay by $18.15

Learn more about federal-state tax, refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/25828729

7 0
2 years ago
What is fraud and how does it impact health care costs?
valentinak56 [21]

The National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA) estimates that the financial losses due to health care fraud are in the tens of billions of dollars each year.

Whether you have employer-sponsored health insurance or you purchase your own insurance policy, health care fraud inevitably translates into higher premiums and out-of-pocket expenses for consumers, as well as reduced benefits or coverage. For employers-private and government alike-health care fraud increases the cost of providing insurance benefits to employees and, in turn, increases the overall cost of doing business. For many Americans, the increased expense resulting from fraud could mean the difference between making health insurance a reality or not.

However, financial losses caused by health care fraud are only part of the story. Health care fraud has a human face too. Individual victims of health care fraud are sadly easy to find. These are people who are exploited and subjected to unnecessary or unsafe medical procedures. Or whose medical records are compromised or whose legitimate insurance information is used to submit falsified claims.

<span>Don't be fooled into thinking that health care fraud is a victimless crime. There is no doubt that health care fraud can have devastating effects.</span>

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Patsy Banz owns 220 shares of General Mills Corporation. For the last calendar quarter, General Mills Corporation paid $0.47 a s
    11·1 answer
  • High and unexpected inflation has a greater cost
    15·2 answers
  • Gideon Company uses the allowance method of accounting for uncollectible accounts. On May 3, the Gideon Company wrote off the $2
    13·1 answer
  • Is the standard deviation of the sample a good estimate of the variation of salaries of TV personalities in​ general? A. ​No, be
    11·1 answer
  • Rhonda has an adjusted basis and an at-risk amount of $25,600 in a passive activity at the beginning of the year. She also has a
    14·1 answer
  • The idea that the mission of business is to produce goods and services at a profit, thus maximizing its contribution to society
    11·1 answer
  • The production department in a process manufacturing system completed 80,000 units of product and transferred them to finished g
    12·1 answer
  • ‼️‼️ Which of the following statements about international business is the most
    8·2 answers
  • Empower Inc., is a software development firm that firmly believes in common unspoken assumptions along the lines of conventional
    14·1 answer
  • Marketing goods and services to the B2B market relies more heavily on advertising than marketing efforts aimed toward the consum
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!