Answer:
Explanation:
"I spend more on orange juice even as the price rises".
This implies that orange juice is not an inferior good because people demand less of an inferior product when their prices fall. In this case more is demanded as price rises implying that orange juice is being viewed as a luxury good or healthy drink. Consumers tend to interpret certain price increase positively and view the goods as superior.
Does this mean that I must be violating the law of demand?
YES
Generally, the law of demand states that, "citeris paribus (with all things being equal), as the price of a good rises, quantity demanded falls; conversely, as the price of a good falls, quantity demanded increases".
Therefore if "I spend more on orange juice even as the price rises", then obviously the law of demand is being violated
Answer:
Contribution margin per pound
K1 - $16.90
S5 - $8.60
G9 - $10.40
Explanation:
Both sales and variable cost are dependent on the number of units sold.
The sales less the variable cost gives the contribution margin. The contribution margin less the fixed cost gives the net operating income.
The contribution margin per pound for each of the three products is the ratio of the contribution margin per unit of a product to the number of pounds required per unit of that product.
K1 S5 G9
Selling price $147.39 $112.64 $215.56
Variable costs $95.00 $92.00 $149.00
Contribution margin $52.39 $20.64 $66.56
Pounds per unit 3.1 2.4 6.4
Contribution margin/pound $16.90 $8.60 $10.40
Answer:
Explanation:
Assume the initial invest at the beginning is $100.
The investment at end of year 4 is:
100 x 1.16 x 1.11 x 1.1 x 1.1 = 155.80
a) CAGR over the 4 years = (155.8 / 100 ) ^ (1/4) = 11.72%
b) Average annual return over 4 years = (16% +11% + 10% +10%) /4 = 11.75%
c) Since the returns over the 4 year period are not much volatile, average annual return is a better measure.
If the investment's returns are independent and identically distributed, Average annual return will be the better measure because there is no correlation between returns over the years and thus there is no point to take into consideration the compounding effect by using CAGR.
Answer:
Funsters should increase the supply of its doll now before the other doll hits the market.
Explanation:
