1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Misha Larkins [42]
3 years ago
14

What was the main reason that Athens and Sparta fought the Peloponnesian War?​

History
1 answer:
lianna [129]3 years ago
3 0

The Athens wanted to become the most powerful place in greece and the Sparta and all its allies started to feel threatened by Athens growing power and growing naval base.

You might be interested in
Why did americans create such a limited government during the revolutionary war?
ddd [48]
They created a limited government because they were escaping an oppressive one. They had been under the rule of Great Britain, a basically unlimited government. They did not want to create the same thing to replace the one that they had known. 
4 0
3 years ago
How did the islands make the development of Rome difficult
lisov135 [29]

Two mountain ranges, the Alps and the Apennines, helped to protect Rome from invasion. The Apennines divide the Italian peninsula in half and, according to SPQR Online, allowed the Romans to mass forces for counter-attack whenever they were threatened.

5 0
3 years ago
What famous city-state rebels against Alexander the Great? What happens to that city-state?
natulia [17]

Answer:

Thebes (correct me if I'm wrong)

Alexander the Great and his army win the battle.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes the design for the flag of the Confederacy?
Phantasy [73]
Don't hold it to me but I think the correct answer is stars and bars. Because stars and stripes is the american flag so is red, white, and blue. Don't tread on me is the snake.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a paragraph, explain why President Wilson encountered opposition in the U.S. Senate in his efforts to ratify the Treaty of Ve
sergey [27]

Answer:

On the side of Wilson, that is, for the adoption of the Treaty of Versailles and the ensuing entry into the League of Nations in order to continue direct intervention in European affairs, a significant part of both the ruling circles and the "public" spoke. Wilson's position was supported by prominent business leaders. The defense of the Treaty of Versailles focused on proving the United States’s worth of creating the League of Nations. With the help of the league and the Versailles Treaty, senators Hitchcock, Kellogg, Owen and others said that the United States will be able to rebuild Europe, sell its goods widely, which will improve the country's economic prospects for many years to come. The mandate system will open access to the colonies, to the Turkish Straits, to Middle East oil and other raw materials.

But the central argument of supporters of the Versailles system remained the argument that through the League of Nations the United States will be able to gain the position of the dominant power in the world. Senator Owen argued during the discussions that the League of Nations has a whole arsenal of means - diplomatic pressure, arbitration, and the International Court of Justice, boycott, blockade, the use of collective armed forces - and with their help the fate of any international dispute can be decided. Wilson’s supporters said the US’s joining the league will help “overcome social unrest in Europe,” stop the growth of socialist forces.

The opposition to the Wilsonists was called isolationist, although it itself did not recognize this name. The term "isolationism," despite all its conventions (in fact, it did not mean calling for the isolation of America), nevertheless had a constant content: the rejection of political and especially military alliances with Europe, 'bequeathed' by George Washington in 1796.

In the Senate, the first movement was a bloc of so-called “irreconcilable” (with a fluctuating number of 12 to 36 out of 96 senators), headed by William Bora, one of the most critical opposition leaders. Bora, Lafollett, Norris and other senators of this group 'attacked' the League of Nations as a tool for drawing the United States into alien wars, in defense of extraneous interests, and protested against anti-Soviet intervention.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did conservatives criticize the government's unfunded mandates?​
    9·2 answers
  • What does flint michigan and birmingham alabama have in common?
    10·1 answer
  • What rule states that courts will exclude any evidence that is obtained in violation of the fourth amendment's provisions agains
    14·1 answer
  • The president has six distinct roles. Which of the following roles does NOT belong to the President of the United States?
    10·2 answers
  • Which TWO factors played an important role in stopping Napoleon from conquering Russia? A.) Russia's scorched-earth policy B.)Gr
    5·1 answer
  • Short summary of the illiad, the quarrel
    10·1 answer
  • In his Cherokee Nation v. Georgia opinion, Chief Justice John Marshall stated that Group of answer choices Georgia had to respec
    9·1 answer
  • What type of democracy does the United Kingdom have? What does that mean
    12·1 answer
  • Blank is a belief system which holds that non human beings and object have souls and spirits.
    8·1 answer
  • What aspect of the south's economy would make the anaconda plan effective
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!