All categories

3 years ago

Anthropologists theorize that food sharing Group of answer choices

Social Studies

1 answer:

Minchanka [31]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

2. encourages others to share when you need it.

Explanation:

Food sharing has long been known as an important factor in many processes in various cultures, such as ceremonies, rituals, kin selections, etc.

But underneath all those processes what is most important is reciprocity and the fact that by sharing food, the giver ensures that the other side will return the favor eventually, especially in the time of need.

The person who shared doesn't have to be consciously aware of that and to share just for the benefit, but this reciprocity subliminal benefit of every food sharing.

You might be interested in

if you could change anything in the world, what would it be? explain why and how you would change it.

lora16 [44]

If I could change anything in the world, what I would change is the act of racism.

<h3>What is racism?</h3>

Racism can be describe as the belief that some groups of humans have some behavioral traits which could be inherited attributes as well as the belief of the superiority of one race over another.

It should be noted that If I could change anything in the world, what I would change is the act of racism because it is bringing disunity.

Learn more about racism at:

brainly.com/question/392936

#SPJ1

7 0

2 years ago

In response to its disagreement with the tariff bill of 1832, the South Carolina legislature actually voted to nullify the law w

poizon [28]

Answer: Letter C is the correct answer.

Explanation: The state of South Carolina legislature disagreed with the Tariff Bill of 1832, they called it the "Tariff of Abominations" because it placed a tax on foreign goods that was the highest tax ever passed before. When South Carolina voted to nullify the bill from its borders, the President Andrew Jackson threatened to send federal troops to force the state of South Carolina to comply with the law.

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

We have spent time thinking about how Congress and the President overlaps in power, but we need to now focus on how the Presiden

shtirl [24]

Answer: 1) Supreme court always opposes anything that is against constitutio

2) They give judgment without favouritism

Explanation:

The Supreme Court has taken these particular stands in the court by rejecting the argument that presidents or executive officials could waive statutory policy, in this case the Neutrality Act of 1794. A president may not authorize a person to do what the law forbids

The overall opinion the Supreme Court believe about Presidential Power are:

the Supreme Court interpreted constitutional disputes between the two elected branches without favoring presidential power over Congress.

It also recognized that, when a presidential proclamation in time of war conflicts with congressional language expressed in a statute, the legislative position prevails

8 0

4 years ago

What is the relationship between healthy self-love and love of god and neighbor?

pychu [463]

Genuine self love is necessary to love God and others. we should love ourselves because we are made in God's image, beings of incomparable value that God created out of nothing for himself.

6 0

4 years ago

All but one of these countries were important in the earliest exploration of what would eventually be South Carolina. Which of t

motikmotik

C) Portugal

Hope this helps and please make mine the Brainliest answer!

6 0

3 years ago