Answer:
practice the ceiling breach and pull
Explanation:
Answer:
Concentric circles are circles with a common center. The region between two concentric circles of different radii is called an annulus. Any two circles can be made concentric by inversion by picking the inversion center as one of the limiting points.
1. Picking any two points on the outer circle and connecting them gives 1/3.
2. Picking any random point on a diagonal and then picking the chord that perpendicularly bisects it gives 1/2.
3. Picking any point on the large circle, drawing a line to the center, and then drawing the perpendicularly bisected chord gives 1/4.
So some care is obviously needed in specifying what is meant by "random" in this problem.
Given an arbitrary chord BB^' to the larger of two concentric circles centered on O, the distance between inner and outer intersections is equal on both sides (AB=A^'B^'). To prove this, take the perpendicular to BB^' passing through O and crossing at P. By symmetry, it must be true that PA and PA^' are equal. Similarly, PB and PB^' must be equal. Therefore, PB-PA=AB equals PB^'-PA^'=A^'B^'. Incidentally, this is also true for homeoids, but the proof is nontrivial.
Answer: B. A teenager watching his parents argue
Explanation:
Answer:
A. meet with representatives to educate them about the bill
Explanation:
An interest group can be defined as a group of people sharing common aims, ideas and concerns, which seeks to influence government or a public policy.
This ultimately implies that, the interest groups consists of individuals who are only concerned about influencing public policy of the government on the basis of a particular common aim and interest.
Hence, an action which a special interest group would take in order to gain support for a law proposed in Congress is meeting with representatives to educate them about the bill. This would help the interest group to have a better understanding of the bill, as well as endearing them to the representatives.
A bill can be defined as a formally written proposal presented to the legislators such as senators or house of members for legislation.
Overview. The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
