All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is not a requirement for a personal services contract to be valid?

Law

1 answer:

yKpoI14uk [10]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The correct option is A,it must be writing.

Explanation:

For a service to be valid it must be based on something lawful which is enforceable at law,otherwise the law court would declare as null and void,hence in that case performance of the other party cannot be enforced.

Consideration is also an important ingredient,which implies that something worthy or valuable must exchange hands between the parties to the contract as a compensation for performance of duties.

The parties must also be seen by law capable individuals nor minors who have no capability to enter into a valid contract.

All in all,option A is the odd one sticking out.

You might be interested in

Brrunno [24]

Answer:

D. National Incident-Based Reporting System.

Explanation:

The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) is a program of the federal government of the United States of America that was launched in 1929.

The main purpose of the UCR is to gather and compile informations on crimes that were committed and reported to the law enforcement agencies in the United States of America.

Generally, the federal bureau of intelligence (FBI) are saddled with the responsibility of publishing these crime statistics reports in the United States of America.

This ultimately implies that, the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) measures the most serious crimes in the United States of America, also referred to as Part I crimes.

The new redesigned Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) is called the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). It took a five (5) year redesign effort to transform the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) program into the more comprehensive and well-detailed National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is TRUE about judicial review?

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

wrong the answer is D

Explanation:

The principle of judicial review is not in the Constitution.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are 3 useful questions to ask when drafting a law?

nevsk [136]

1. what are the clients business purpose and objectives?
2. what are the structure and operations of the deal?
3. who will likely use the document going forward?

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Cases heard by the Supreme Court are named for the two or more parties who oppose each other. A party can be either an individua

Oxana [17]

Answer:

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.

Explanation:

The 1831 Supreme Court case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a court ruling between the Cherokee Nation, the petitioners, against the state of Georgia, the respondent.

In this court case, the Cherokees filed a complaint against the State of Georgia, asking if the state has any jurisdiction to impose laws on the Nation. This was because the state has promised Cherokee lands to Georgian settlers if they settle in the state. The court decided that since the Cherokees are a dependent nation, it cannot make any decision as it has no jurisdiction over the case. Thus, this means that the Cherokee Nation cannot have any legal recourse to stop the state from taking their lands. This case was then followed up by the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling where the court ruled in favor of the Cherokee people.

Thus, the correct answer is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.

3 0

2 years ago

Appellate judges can hear the same testimony and consider the same evidence as the trial court did in rendering a decision. Is t

olganol [36]

Yes it is true because they can overturn a conviction that happened in a trial court.

6 0

3 years ago