1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirza4 [7]
3 years ago
11

What was the result in the case of U.S. v. Park, the case in which the defendant, the president of a national food-chain corpora

tion, claimed he should not be held liable for allowing food in a warehouse to be exposed to rodent contamination because he had delegated responsibility to subordinates
Law
1 answer:
goblinko [34]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:he is right

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Damages intended to punish a defendant and deter the defendant from engaging in the same tortuous conduct in the future are call
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

<h3>c. Punitive damages.</h3>

Explanation:

Through the allocation of Punitive damages, it provides the distressed plaintiff the right to punish and deter the defendant from engaging in the same offense in the future.

Those who support punitive damages contends that such provisions would help the society from witnessing similar offences from the same person or an organisation in the future. In simple terms, punitive damages are like deterrence that will keep a check on the offender from making the same offence in the future.

It is a retributive action that tries to sends a message that offenders will be prosecuted with heavy penalty and consequences.

8 0
3 years ago
How has the confirmation power change reflected<br> political trends in American government?
lukranit [14]

Answer:

Key points

The Framers of the US Constitution structured the government so that the three branches have separate powers. The branches must both cooperate and compete to enact policy.

Each of the branches has the power to check the other two, which ensures that no one branch can become too powerful and that government as a whole is constrained.

This structure ensures that the people’s will is represented by allowing citizens multiple access points to influence public policy, and permitting the removal of officials who abuse their power.

The structure of US government: separation of powers

By the late 1780s, it had become clear that the first governmental system of the United States, the Articles of Confederation, wasn’t working. The central government under the Articles lacked a strong executive and a method for resolving disputes at the national level.

But adding a strong executive branch to the US government might pose the opposite problem. Would an executive, wielding the power of the army, become too powerful? Would a federal government with more power overall soon become tyrannical?

At the Constitutional Convention, the Framers debated these issues. Their ultimate solution was to separate the powers of government among three branches—legislative, executive, and judicial—so that each branch had to cooperate with the others in order to accomplish policymaking goals. For example, although the executive branch commands the military, only the legislative branch can declare war and make funds available to pay and provision the army. Therefore, both the legislative branch (Congress) and the executive branch (the president) must consent for the United States to go to war.

Accordingly, each branch of government has unique powers. As the branch most responsive to the will of the people (who elect its members), Congress has the power to pass laws, declare war, ratify treaties, and levy taxes. The executive branch conducts foreign affairs and commands the armed forces. The judicial branch interprets the laws of Congress and the actions of the president to determine whether they are constitutional.

Powers of the branches of government

Legislative branch

Executive branch

Judicial branch

Pass laws Veto legislation Declare laws unconstitutional

Declare war Command armed forces Hear cases on federal law

Impeach president and judges Grant pardons Preside over impeachment trials

Approve presidential appointments Appoint judges, ambassadors, department heads Declare presidential acts unconstitutional

Ratify treaties Conduct foreign affairs and negotiate treaties

Levy taxes  

Establish number of Supreme Court justices  

Regulate Supreme Court's jurisdiction  

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
With which answer choice would President
WARRIOR [948]

Vladimir Putin decided to invade Ukraine as Russia didn't want Ukraine to join NATO. The Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky is most likely to agree with,"I need ammunition, not a ride"

What is the current situation in Ukraine?

Recently President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed it Ukraine public in the war situation and to motivate the army and the public he was dressed in the army uniform and said," You are indomitable,” he added. “You are Ukrainians.”

He also quash the rumor of fleeing from the country in this war situation by walking down the streets and addressing the his countrymen and all other countries who assured to help Ukraine," I need more ammunition not a ride."

Hence with war situation turned the president of Ukraine in stronger man  and repealed the opinion about him which was a comedian turned into politician and he more likely to agree with in need of more ammunition statement and the countrymen are indomitable.

Learn more about Valdimir Putin here:

brainly.com/question/873757

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
QUESTION 8 of 10: What is a focus group?
Talja [164]
A focus group is a research method that brings together a small group of people to answer questions in a moderated setting. The group is chosen due to predefined demographic traits, and the questions are designed to shed light on a topic of interest. Focus groups are a type of qualitative research.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Did the appellate court agree with the trial court's order that Case Western must issue a diploma to Amir Al-Dabagh
ohaa [14]

Answer:

NO

Explanation:

Al-Dabagh, a dermatologist, was said to have completed all the academic requirements at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) for him to become a medical doctor. They school did not give him the required certificate with series of cases brought against him for being unprofessional in his conducts.

Many times, he was found late, and that delayed the classes on several occasions. There are also times he was said to have put up inappropriate acts with some girls in his class and in another incidence, it was said that he rode on a cab and refused to pay afterwards. Though he denied all these, but that did not convince the university to shift ground.

There was a trial court judgment that he should be given the certificate he merited. CWRU decided to appeal the case further and the supreme court reversed the judgement made by the trial court, reaffirming the stance of the university.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is an example of an interest group?
    5·1 answer
  • If a plaintiff brings a civil lawsuit against a defendant for breach of contract or fraud, what burden of proof appliesPreponder
    7·1 answer
  • Roland carries out various responsibilities as a part of the US police force. He is in charge of patrolling and important invest
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT an indication of being drowsy?
    8·2 answers
  • Jessa wants to sell her product to a skeptical customer, so she claims it will last forever, even
    6·1 answer
  • On Sunday, October 6, 1974, the Leweiston Lodge of Elks sponsored a golf tournament at the Fairlawn Country Club in Poland, Main
    8·1 answer
  • The development of fundamental rights protection in the EU
    11·1 answer
  • Police officer placing sign outside a rail station that says 'Waiting Room for White Only.'
    11·2 answers
  • Question 15 (True/False Worth 2 points)
    8·1 answer
  • A restriction on commercial speech that does not implement a substantial
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!