Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: Conducting the job analysis.
Explanation:
To begin with, the term of <em>"Job Analysis"</em> refers to a method used in the organizations with the purpose of generating job descriptions and specifications in order to establish a better communication inside the organization and also to know better who the best candidates will be for future jobs. Therefore that this analysis focus on the correct comprehension from the analyst regarding the job that is being under analysis. When the analysis has began the person in charge of it will have to planned carafully the way that she will get the information for later transform it into the job description and that is why that once that the planning has been done the person needs to conduct the job analysis in order to obtain the results expect that are the proper description of the job and all of its specifications for future employees.
Answer:
Advocates of the efficient market is of the belief that information that is made available publicly is usually reflected in security prices and thus adjustments in price to new information will occur swiftly. Hence, under the EMH, there are no guarantees on the prices of the stock market and thus no investment rules that can bring superior returns. In this light, investors would rather not deviate from the market index.
On the other hand, advocates of behavioral finance is of the belief that biases in behavior is capable of causing stock market prices to be inefficient. Hence making the investors to believe that a deviation from the market portfolio would be advantageous although the level of risk may be high.
Explanation:
Answer:A
Explanation:
Persuading is a way to to gain attraction
A) Bank Loan
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, It’s A
Answer:
a. Labuk does not have a harassment claim based on national origin because these two incidents, although offensive, do not create a hostile work environment.
Explanation:
In order for Labuk to have a valid harassment claim, his supervisor must have created an offensive and hostile work environment. Apparently, the supervisor's bad attitude is not shared by Labuk's colleagues, at least it doesn't say so in the question.
The supervisor's attitude might not have been appropriate, but two incidents in 20 years is something can happen to anyone and not just Labuk. Imagine how many times an employee might argue or have some type of dispute with a supervisor during 20 years. Labuk should have reported both incidents to a company's manager.
