Answer:
Lein Theory.
Explanation:
Lien theory refers to the theory in which the buyer stops the property deed at the time of the mortgage. Also the buyer promised to pay all the payments so that the mortgage could become a lien on a property but at the same time the title would remain with the buyer but if all the payments are paid so the lien could be removed
Therefore in the given situation, it represents the lien theory
Answer:
Multiple IRRs:
Said another way, Multiple IRRs occur when a project has more than one <em>internal rate of return.</em> The problem arises where a project has non-normal cash flow (non-conventional cash flow pattern).
Internal rate of return (IRR) is one of the most commonly used capital budgeting tools. Investors make decisions by comparing the IRR of the project under consideration with the <em>hurdle rate</em>. If the IRR is greater than the hurdle rate, the project is accepted, otherwise it is rejected. When there are more than two IRRs, it is not exactly clear which IRR to compare with the hurdle rate.
Hurdle rate is the minimum required rate of return which businesses use as a benchmark to decide whether to invest in a project or not.
<em>So a typical situation which can generate negative cashflows which can in turn lead to multiple IRRs towards the end of the project is where the conditions of investment become adverse towards the end of the project.</em>
Imagine that toward the end of the lifecycle of a project, a forecasted increase external costs such as Interest Rate, influenced by government policies translates to an erosion of the bottom line generated by the business in that year.
Period 0 1 3 3 4 5
Unconventional cash flows ($)-19,000 16,000 16,000 6,000 6,000 -52,000
The series is non-conventional cash-flow pattern, which has two sign changes. This is the range in which the net present value of the non-conventional cash flow series is positive. The multiple IRR problem poses a series problem to analysts because the decision is not obvious.
Cheers!
Answer:
Present value of interest is $5,062 and future value is $5,796
Explanation:
The formula for finding the Present value of the interest reported as revenue is calculated as under:
Present Value of $40,000 receivable in 2 years = $40,000 / (1+7%)^2
Present Value of $40,000 receivable in 2 years = $34,938
The difference of the future value receivable and present value of the future amount receivable is the interest's present value which is given as under:
Interest Present value = $40,000 - $34,938 = $5,062
Using the compounding formula, the future value of the interest that will be recorded in the financial statement will be = $5,062 * (1 + 7%)^2 years
Future value of interest = $5796
Answer:
the marginal cost curve is upward sloping.
Explanation:
Utility can be defined as any satisfaction or benefits a customer derives from the use of a product or service.
This ultimately implies that, any satisfaction or benefits a customer derives from the use of a product or service is generally referred to as a utility.
Basically, the marginal utility of goods and services is the additional satisfaction that a consumer derives from consuming or buying an additional unit of a good or service.
For example, buying a candy stick and eating it may satisfy your cravings but eating another one (an additional or extra unit) wouldn't give you as much satisfaction as the first due to diminishing marginal utility.
In Economics, the law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the unit of a good or service consumed by an individual increases, the additional satisfaction he or she derives from consuming additional units would start decreasing or diminishing as the units of good or service consumed increases.
Marginal cost can be defined as the additional or extra cost that is being incurred by a company as a result of the production of an additional unit of a product or service.
Generally, marginal cost can be calculated by dividing the change in production costs by the change in level of output or quantity. A marginal cost curve is upward sloping because of the law of diminishing returns.
