not able to understand the language
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Advances in radar and mine detection technology.
Moreover, Alliances are formed for various reasons, such as the need for financial or military support, trade agreements, investments or loans. Alliances became strong in the early 19th century when European states either wanted to support the French dictator Napoleon Bonaparte or to defeat him.
You can learn about this at:
brainly.com/question/8320685#SPJ4
Urbanisation results from a natural increase in the population and rural to urban migration. People migrate to towns and cities in hope of gaining a better standard of living. They are influenced by pull factors that attract them to urban life, and push factors that make them dissatisfied with rural living.
We cant answer this question if you don't give us following options.<span />
