Answer:
The goal of voting is to elect representatives by the voice of the people. However when only two parties are allowed to run, American choices are restricted by limited views and only given two choices. This restriction seems to be effective, but is simple not accomplishing the goal of electing the representatives the people actually want. <u>This argument says that a 2 parties system is bad </u>
Here is another argument
While the constitution does not provide language that explicitly endorses a two party system, a great deal of its laws perpetuate their existence like the electoral college and plurality voting. The electoral college makes it virtually impossible for a third party candidate to win any given office by discouraging votes in individual states amongst other things. Likewise, plurality voting, which guarantees the candidate with the majority of votes wins, generally favors two opposing sides as time goes by. This is only made stronger by the fact that The majority of Americans seem to lean towards the right or left, with a small percentage staying in between. As long as these systems are in place, a two party system will naturally prevail. <u>This argument says that the 2 parties system is good.</u>
Explanation:
It's just how you look at really if you think its bad then your think its bad same goes for the person who says its good. It's just an opinion. But each side will have supporting facts and details.
The industrial revolution
if thats one of ur answers
Answer:
im pretty sure its Sviatopolk I, but dont trust me on that one
Answer:
Share his/her ideas on everything or,
Socrates thinks that the duty of an Individual is to share his/her ideas on everything so that people could start to open their mind and look at ideas or laws from a different perspective, a perspective not dictated by the government.
Explanation:
Socrates thinks that the duty of an Individual is to share his/her ideas on everything so that people could start to open their mind and look at ideas or laws from a different perspective, a perspective not dictated by the government.
