Answer: Because it showed that change is possible
Explanation/context:
The medieval era had been one in which the Roman Catholic Church dominated the culture of Europe, and it was thought that no one could successfully challenge such a deeply ingrained institution. However, the Reformation movement by Martin Luther and other Protestant figures showed that even something as entrenched and enduring at the Catholic Church could be challenged, and changes could be accomplished. Even during Martin Luther's lifetime, this idea that change was possible motivated people to launch efforts toward other major changes to powerful systems. The Peasants Revolt that occurred in Germany in 1524-1525 took Luther's push for reform in the church and applied it to make a push for change in feudal society. Martin Luther himself didn't agree with that and opposed the Peasants Revolt, but as Schaff points out, the momentum of the Reformation was a "propelling force" inspiring other "forward movements" to make changes in society.
According to the argument of Douglas, the issues of slavery would endure as long as states are able to decide their laws for themselves.
<h3>Douglas's argument on slavery</h3>
According to Douglas, the states of the new country were the ones that had the powers to decide on the fact that they wanted the institution of slavery to remain or not.
Lincoln's argument on the other hand was that the use of slaves had to be stopped in the United states.
Read more on Douglas here:
brainly.com/question/16024772
The goal was to stop the spread of Communism.
(Look into Domino Theory.)
Answer:
During World War II, as an alternative to rationing, Americans planted “victory gardens,” in which they grew their own food. Families were issued ration stamps that were used to buy their allotment of everything from meat, sugar, fat, butter, vegetables and fruit to gas, tires, clothing and fuel oil.
