Jane evaluates x squared minus 3 x + 5 for x = negative 2 below. Step 1: (negative 2) squared minus 3 (negative 2) + 5 Step 2: E quals negative 4 + 6 + 5 Step 3: Equals 7 What, if any, was Jane's mistake?
1 answer:
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the question :
Jane evaluates x squared minus 3 x + 5 for x = negative 2 below. Step 1: (negative 2) squared minus 3 (negative 2) + 5 Step 2: Equals negative 4 + 6 + 5 Step 3: Equals 7 What, if any, was Jane's mistake?
Jane's evaluation :
x² - 3x + 5 for x = - 2
Step 1:
(-2)² - 3(-2) + 5
Step 2:
-4 + 6 + 5
Step 3 :
= 7
Jane's mistake was in STEP2,
evaluating (-2)² = 4 and not - 4
Hence, (-2)² - 3(-2) + 5
= 4 + 6 + 5
= 15
You might be interested in
Answer:
60ft
Step-by-step explanation:
I have not done this kind of work in a while but if you scale each side of the square by 6 is should increase to a perimeter of 60ft
The answer is C. 1 You can just plug in the different answers for x and see which one equals zero. F(1) = 1 + 4 + 1 - 6 = 0
Mmmmbrntnrjneuneunre unenriched
Answer:
d = 3 meters
Step-by-step explanation:
d = rt where d is the distance t is the time and r is the constant of proportionality
d = 18t
Changing 10 minutes to hours
10 minutes * 1 hours / 60 minute = 1/6 hour
d = 18 * 1/6 hour
d = 3 meters