1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Umnica [9.8K]
3 years ago
7

What does corroborating sources allow a political scientist to do?​

History
1 answer:
AlekseyPX3 years ago
8 0

It helps them determine whether an assertion made by one source is likely to be true.

FOR FARTHER EXPLANATION

Corroboration is the skill of comparing multiple sources regarding an event to find the most consistent and valid version of the event.

Political scientists would use corroboration to determine political results, polling, campaign progress, as well as bill development. A study on the passage of the Affordable Care Act for example would pull together versions of the bill as well as party opinions on the bill. In writing an assessment on the bill, the political scientists would look at all of the information and come to a conclusion.

You might be interested in
Why would Wilson's feelings toward Germany not be popular with his French and British counterparts ?
Alecsey [184]

Because it would affect their dominance on the soil of Europe, but even outside.

Explanation:

  • After the war Wilson presented his idea of creating a peaceful society.
  • it meant also the creation of League of Nations.
  • It also meant that a period of Imperialism has ended, and that hostilities should be a part of past.

Learn more on Woodrow Wilson on

brainly.com/question/903044

brainly.com/question/11208945

#learnwithBrainly

6 0
3 years ago
What has been the role in world history of pastoral peoples in general and the mongols in particular?
erastova [34]
<span>- Produced agriculture where no one had thought possible.
- Played roles as traders and bandits on long distance trade routes. 
- Played roles in the the collapses of the 2nd wave civilizations and their rebuilds. 
- Supported Buddhism in China 
- Nomadic Bedouin Arabs aided in expansion of Islam. 
- Turks carried Islam to new lands. 
- Mongols made largest empire of the time. - Facilitated closer connections across Eurasia. 
- Increased the rate of technology & crop exchange, mixing of peoples, spread of epidemic disease. 
- Mongol tolerance of other religions facilitated spread of religion.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Was Columbus really a conqueror? was he the bad guy? explain your reasoning 5 sentences​
Degger [83]

Answer:

1.Christopher Columbus was a fraud.2. He was indeed a brave and prolific explorer.  3.but he also was a brutal evil man who never even made it to the place that is now the United States.4. We all believe that Columbus is a villain than a hero.

5.First of all, according to Wikipedia, A hero (masculine) or heroine (feminine) is a person or main character of a literary work who, in the face of danger, combats adversity through feats of ingenuity, bravery or strength, often sacrificing their own personal concerns for a greater good. However, based on what we have learned about Christopher Columbus, what he did has nothing to do with the definition of hero. His motivation to take the travel was to arrive in India, a country in east Asia, to obtain gold. From this perspective, his motivation was not noble. In addition, he did not arrive in India.

Secondly, he set a bad example to colonists came later. According to the article “Christopher Columbus: Hero or Murderer?” by Whitney DeWitt, it is said that “Columbus’s arrogance and exploitation regarding slavery began on his second voyage. Ferdinand and Isabella had ordered that the natives be treated kindly. In opposition to this order, Columbus began exporting slaves in great numbers in 1494.” His way to treat the native residents was improper and rude, which is bad model to colonists who came later. A hero is supposed to be a decent man who get rid of bad reputation. Columbus’ behavior did not conform to the standard.

Because of the reasons given above, it will be hard to classify Christopher Columbus as a hero. His motivation to come to American continent was not noble. He set a bad example to colonists who came later. In addition, his arrival caused a catastrophe to local residents. Therefore, he is more like a villain than a hero.

brainliest plz

8 0
2 years ago
What was the impact of new trade routes on kush​
Nastasia [14]
Kush was weakened by the loss of trade.
4 0
3 years ago
Briefly describe the relationship between the American colonies before the Revolutionary War.
Debora [2.8K]
The <span>relationship between the American colonies before the Revolutionary War was almost non-existent--with each colony functioning very much independently from the others, as if they were almost different countries. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what way does the cartoon illustrate the notion of federalism
    7·1 answer
  • Reincarnation is the hindu belief that ?
    9·1 answer
  • Which word best describes Hammurabi’s Code?
    7·2 answers
  • Were children evacuated from Manchester or relocated to Manchester during WW2?
    5·2 answers
  • Who is the first President of Uganda
    12·2 answers
  • What was the name of the leader of the stono rebellion
    7·1 answer
  • Why did totalitarian governments control culture, such as books and films? to ensure that all citizens had access to the arts to
    12·1 answer
  • LINKS WILL BE REPORTED BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
    15·2 answers
  • How did the rise of nationalism influence the global community in the 20th<br> century?
    9·1 answer
  • Ito ay isang platforms internet na karaniwang salita ng ingles ang nagkakaintindihan ang lahat​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!