1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mote1985 [20]
2 years ago
13

Legislative branch fill on the blank.

History
1 answer:
Andrew [12]2 years ago
8 0
The third blank is limited I believe and the first is veto?? And the second is override.
You might be interested in
NEED HELP ASAP BEEN STUCK ON THIS FOR AWHILE, PLZ HELP ME! IM SO CONFUSED!
Andrei [34K]

Explanation:

In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.

In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.

Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.

The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.

After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for  nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.

Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!

8 0
2 years ago
They Say
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:

its really really good use this

7 0
3 years ago
What other factors led to tension in American society during the 1950s and early sixties? What did some see as the cure?
DanielleElmas [232]

Answer:

they have different

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
How were serfs different from enslaved persons? Serfs could purchase their freedom, and enslaved persons could not. The children
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Serfs worked for their lord's protection, and enslaved persons had no protection.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
35 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tatiyna

The correct answer for this question, is D.) Cuba's proximity to the United States made it possible for large-scale missile attacks.

I took the test and got this question correct.

Hope this helps!

Have a good one,

- Kaitlin L.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 8 reasons why Rome fell
    7·1 answer
  • The convention of hieratic scale can be seen in the royal standard Ur, or head of an akkadian man, or human headed winged bulk,
    9·1 answer
  • What were president Lincoln's reasons for issuing the emancipation proclamation, and why did it free only those slaves who lived
    5·1 answer
  • Which is NOT an example of white resistance to desegregation
    14·2 answers
  • What ideas did the greeks express in their art and architecture
    15·1 answer
  • Were the colonies the only market for England’s manufactured goods? Why or why not?
    12·1 answer
  • In 1752, Benjamin Franklin had a theory that lightning was electricity. He wanted to prove that the power could be transferred t
    12·1 answer
  • How was the Industrial Revolution sparked?​
    13·1 answer
  • Mahatma Gandhi fought for India to obtain "sharan," which means
    11·1 answer
  • To have been a person of the renaissance meant
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!