Answer:
B. As the evidence shows, moderate exercise can be beneficial to good health.
Explanation:
That is a better conclusion then the other ones because your writing should flow from your introduction through the body of the essay to the conclusion. In the introduction, you introduce main or central ideas. In the body of your text, you provide reasons, examples, and support for your central ideas. In the conclusion, you review those central ideas in a fresh way. For example, you might explain the importance of your central ideas, or you might apply your central ideas to the lives of your readers. You probably will offer a closing idea that you want your readers to take away and remember.
<u>Here are some examples of Good, Meh, And Bad Conclusions:</u>
WEAK CONCLUSION: In summary, calcium is important for healthy teeth and bones.
STRONGER CONCLUSION: Not only is calcium critical for growing bodies that need strong teeth and bones, but it is also easy to access, even for people who cannot eat dairy products.
PARAGRAPH CONCLUSION: It should be evident that calcium is a useful mineral at all stages of life. It builds strong teeth and bones in children and prevents bone loss in middle age. It is not difficult to find calcium in the foods you eat. Even if you cannot eat dairy products, you can find the calcium you need in tofu, kale, and even blackstrap molasses.
The correct answer is A.
The author does not allude the visitor as being Herbert. He merely call it "the thing outside". Therefore, this is not a way the author creates suspense in the story.
The rest of the options: the description of the scraping, the echoes of the knocks, and the difficulty to find the object that was needed, are all elements that help build up suspense in this passage.
A jihad is "a war or struggle against believers" (among Muslims).
I hope you enjoy both this answer and life! :D
The country that had control of India when Gandhi was born is/was Britain. Hope this helped, have a good day :)
Answer:
This chapter, set in the southernmost districts of British India in the first half of the twentieth century, argues that the colonial police were not an entity distant from rural society, appearing only to restore order at moments of rebellion. Rather, they held a widespread and regular, albeit selective, presence in the colonial countryside. Drawing on, and reproducing, colonial knowledge which objectified community and privileged property, routine police practices redirected the constable’s gaze and stave towards ‘dangerous’ spaces and ‘criminal’ subjects. Using detailed planning documents produced by European police officers and routine, previously unexplored, notes maintained by native inspectors at local stations, the chapter argues that colonial policemen also acted as agents of state surveillance and coercion at the level of the quotidian.
Explanation:
