The philosophers of these enlightenment thinkers would be grouped as follows
- John Locke believed that humans have natural rights to life, liberty, and property; and, people form governments to protects these natural rights. If, however, government violates peoples natural rights, people have the right to overthrow that government.
- Baron de Montesquieu believed in the separation of government (balance of power); and the government elected by the people is the best form of government.
- Rousseau believed in in life, liberty, fraternity and a social contract would that give men real freedom in exchange for their obedience to a self-imposed law; the common good supersedes the individual, or private ambitions; all citizens should participate in government
- Hobbes believed humans are basically selfish creatures and need governments to protect them from their own selfishness and evil; thought the rule of a king was best, but believed believed a diverse group of representatives of the people would prevent a king from being cruel and unfair.
- Voltaire believed in religious tolerance
<h3>Who is an enlightenment thinker?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the people that were central to the period enlightenment. They were the ones that had to do with the use and the celebration of human reason in such a way that the issues faced in the society can be resolved.
Read more on enlightenment thinkers here
brainly.com/question/2496343
#SPJ1
Answer:
By creating a Tariff.
Explanation:
A Tariff is additional set of expense that the companies from foreign country need to pay before they can sell their products into our local market.
By imposing this Tariffs, the foreign companies will be forced to increase the price of their product to maintain their profit. When this happen, the customers will be less interested to buying their product and develop a stronger preference to the product created by local businesses. This will very much help the local industries.
In his Politics, Aristotle divides government into 6 kinds, 3 good and 3 bad. The good forms are monarchy, aristocracy, and polity, while the bad forms are tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy. Each of the good forms has the possibility of turning into its bad form - i.e., monarchy into tyranny, aristocracy into oligarchy.
Seeing that democracy is listed in the "bad camp", people automatically assume that Aristotle was anti-democratic. But this is an over-simplification.
By democracy, Aristotle really means mob rule. Polity corresponds more to what we'd think of as modern democracy - a stable, orderly institution that represents and protects the people. For instance, polity is what existed in Athens during its Golden Age. Aristotle didn't oppose this by any means.
Indeed, unlike his teacher Plato, who sought to create an ideal model of the state ruled by philosopher-kings, Aristotle thought that the best form of government was determined by the situation. For a virtuous people, polity could very well be the best form of government; for a subservient people (and Aristotle believed that such people existed), monarchy or tyranny might be the natural state of affairs.
Answer:
The Johnson administration planned for major American military action against North Vietnam nearly five months before the 1964 Tonkin Gulf incident, according to secret government documents made public yesterday by the New York Times.Jun 14, 1971
Answer:I think it was called like that because everyone thought that they will be free after world war 1
Explanation:They thougt they would be free but then the world war 2 started after some time
