Answer:
the second one its definitely that one.
Explanation:
For the first one, I would start by mentioning the characters crime, add something about how it was inexcusable, then incorporate a condensed precis on the characters situation (leaving out any bits that could embody the characters freedom). And end with a statement that discloses that your appeal is unarguable because (enter main argument here) and that is why so and so should be imprisoned.
<span>For the second question, I would personally choose the feminist because it would in theory be easier to explain their basic philosophy and how it is affecting the plot. Because I don't know who the character is, I can't really elaborate further. But please contact me if you need any more help, I'll do what I can. </span>
The answer is: to recall Zeitoun’s foreign birth and the universality of struggles against nature
Zeitoun grown up in a coastal town, Jableh, in Syria, his father was a ship captain and when he and his brother drown to be sailor as well, after many year in the sea he stablishes in New Orleans, in the story is describes the great storm that evokes his memory of the island, this shows Zeitoun birth town and also that the nature forces universality.
The best option seems to be the second one, letter B) This concept is mentioned throughout the book.
The book The Call of the Wild, by Jack London, has as its theme the concept of "survival of the fittest". Survival of the fittest is an expression connected to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. Organisms which are able to adapt to the environment survive. Those which are not end up extinct.
That is precisely what happens in the story by London. The main character is a dog, Buck. Buck is stolen from a family with whom he lived a comfortable life. He has to adapt to a whole new environment and conditions as a sled-dog. He turns out to be so adaptable that he becomes the leader of a pack of wolves by the end of the story.
