I didn’t read the book but when I searched it up it said it’s said something about two boys watching football and eating popcorn at a girls house, sorry I hope it helps and gives you an idea!?
Answer:
Over the weekend, I was shocked to hear that my next door neighbour, who has three adorable children, lost her husband in a freak accident.
As someone who is a parent and has also experienced loss, I empathized with her and was relieved to hear that she had security against the loss of her husband's income.
But not everybody is so lucky.
Did you know that in America over 58% of families would not be able to cover their monthly expenses just a few months after a loved one passed away?
It is often only those life-changing events like the death of a loved one – or the birth of a little one – that cause people to think about their own mortality. People tend to think that what is unlikely to happen will not, and as a result, they expose their family to the hit of a lost income forever.
Explanation:
The consequence is that most people have what we at Swiss Re call a "protection gap" – the term used to describe the difference between the financial means one has and one needs – and it primarily affects the middle classes (those earning between $30,000 and $120,000 per annum). This gap has taken on gigantic proportions. In the US alone, the population mortality protection gap stands at USD 21 trillion, which works out to approximately 400k USD per household. In Europe, the figure is almost as large (USD 17 trillion).
The protection gap exists because people lack awareness about both the gap itself and ways to rectify it.
Answer:
Who is the real monster in Frankenstein?
Victor Frankenstein is the real monster. In 1972, Gaylin lamented that "the tragic irony is not that Mary Shelley's 'fantasy' once again has a relevance. The tragedy is that it is no longer a 'fantasy'—and that in its realization we no longer identify with Dr. Frankenstein but with his monster.".
Explanation:
The true name of the monster was never revealed, instead many gave it the last name of his creator, Victor Frankenstein. Although perhaps that was society’s intent while repurposing this story, to refer to the real monster himself, Mr. Victor Frankenstein; the man who created and abandoned a creature that was capable of destruction. Shelley did not give the hideous creature a name, perhaps for a reason. To not name something dehumanizes it and makes that thing an It – lack of identify due to no name fear of unknown. Yet she gives it such human characteristics by allowing the beast to talk, read, learn another language and even have the capabilities of emotions. Connect better, Sometimes the real monster is not the hideous beast standing in front of you, but rather the beast looking back at you in the mirror. Marry Shelley related Frankenstein’s creation as the product of neglect and lack of responsibility by the creator, a situation all too relevant to today’s society, specify that Mary Shelley wrote the book.
The monster did not choose to be created, he did not choose to look the way that he did, he did not choose to be rejected by everyone around him. As he tells Victor when he approached him in the Alps, “I am malicious because I am miserable.” emphasize what the deeper reasoning is. analyze. There is no moral excuse for the monster’s killing spree, but there may have been a deeper reasoning for Shelley having the monster express this to his creator and possess such strong emotions. When the beast was created, he was brought to the world and left to interact with no one but himself. He discusses with Victor how hard it was for him to even walk around because people would scream in fear at his appearance; Even his own creator left him. clarify that i think the monster is a monster because of doctor, there are two monsters.
Answer:the answer is C
Explanation:
I have the same exam and I got this right
