Answer is: <span>Newberry v. United States.
</span>Newberry v. United States<span>, brought in 1921, was decision by the </span>United States Supreme Court<span> which decided that the </span>United States Constitution <span>did not grant the </span>United States Congress<span> the authority to regulate </span>political party primaries<span> or nomination processes.</span><span>
</span>
I believe it was <span>The Intolerable Acts. </span>
Answer:
The answer is below.
Explanation:
Considering the scenario described in the question, the most directly affected by this ruling is "protection against unreasonable search and seizure"
This is because the approval of a Supreme Court to an issue of obtaining or recording a phone conversation without a warrant will directly affect the individual's protection against the unreasonable search of and seizure of things.
D. state banks
democratic-republicnas like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were against the federalist plans for a national bank and did not want more tariffs. they supported the average farmers.