1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VikaD [51]
4 years ago
12

Why did James I resist parliaments growing power?

History
2 answers:
Mekhanik [1.2K]4 years ago
6 0
It it will be 3 HE BELINED THAT RELIGIOUS LAW SHIULD BE GOVEREMNT LAW
vaieri [72.5K]4 years ago
6 0

A. He believed he was God’s representative and should not be challenged.

You might be interested in
What major cultural elements contributed to the human diversity of south asia? how do the poorer and richer areas of india contr
UkoKoshka [18]
1. I believe the major cultural element would be Religion.
The population in south Asia is not even close to be as diverse as American Population.
In the past, populations with different religion even involved in Civil war that could only be resolved by separating the people into two regions for each region (the Muslim went to Pakistan, the Hindu stay in India)

2. The difference between the poor and the rich in India is even wider than successful capitalistic countries.
This happen because the social stratification in Indian society is much more open and deemed as acceptable by Indian Citizens, which limit the opportunities of civilians in lowe strata

3. The factors that caused the difference are:
- Opportunities that exist within each social stratification
- The after effect of colonization period which allocate the resources in india to the families or organizations that supported the British Empire
- Traditional view that often prevents the advancement in science
3 0
4 years ago
How did the Tang land reform policies strengthen the central government
klio [65]
It weakened the power of large landowners which strengthened the power of the central government. 
4 0
4 years ago
The information on this map suggests that most early colonists
leonid [27]
You didn’t include a pic for your question
3 0
3 years ago
Describe what happened at the “Rap of Nanjing” and give me your thoughts on the US response. How much did we know and would you
Ostrovityanka [42]

Following a bloody victory in Shanghai during the Sino-Japanese War, the Japanese turned their attention towards Nanking. Fearful of losing them in battle, Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-Shek ordered the removal of nearly all official Chinese troops from the city, leaving it defended by untrained auxiliary troops. Chiang also ordered the city held at any cost, and forbade the official evacuation of its citizens. Many ignored this order and fled, but the rest were left to the mercy of the approaching enemy.

Did you know? Once one of China's most prosperous cities and industrial centers, Nanking took decades to recover from the devastation it experienced. Abandoned as the national capital in 1949 for Beijing, it grew into a modern industrial city during the communist period and today is home to many of China's largest state-owned firms.

A small group of Western businessmen and missionaries, the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone, attempted to set up a neutral area of the city that would provide refuge for Nanking’s citizens. The safety zone, opened in November 1937, was roughly the size of New York’s Central Park and consisted of more than a dozen small refugee camps. On December 1, the Chinese government abandoned Nanking, leaving the International Committee in charge. All remaining citizens were ordered into the safety zone for their protection.

Arrival of the Troops

On December 13, the first troops of Japan’s Central China Front Army, commanded by General Matsui Iwane, entered the city. Even before their arrival, word had begun spreading of the numerous atrocities they had committed on their way through China, including killing contests and pillaging. Chinese soldiers were hunted down and killed by the thousands, and left in mass graves. Entire families were massacred, and even the elderly and infants were targeted for execution, while tens of thousands of women were raped. Bodies littered the streets for months after the attack. Determined to destroy the city, the Japanese looted and burned at least one-third of Nanking’s buildings.

Though the Japanese initially agreed to respect the Nanking Safety Zone, ultimately not even these refugees were safe from the vicious attacks. In January 1938, the Japanese declared that order had been restored in the city, and dismantled the safety zone; killings continued until the first week of February. A puppet government was installed, which would rule Nanking until the end of World War II.

Aftermath of the Massacre

There are no official numbers for the death toll in the Nanking Massacre, though estimates range from 200,000 to 300,000 people. Soon after the end of the war, Matsui and his lieutenant Tani Hisao, were tried and convicted for war crimes by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East and were executed. Anger over the events at Nanking continues to color Sino-Japanese relations to this day. The true nature of the massacre has been disputed and exploited for propaganda purposes by historical revisionists, apologists and Japanese nationalists. Some claim the numbers of deaths have been inflated, while others have denied that any massacre occurred.

4 0
3 years ago
These men had convinced many patriotic but (6)________ Americans to trade in their paper certificates
faltersainse [42]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I have noted that your question still appears on the board and nobody has answered it. Your question is confusing and needs more context, information, or references to be understood and answered.

Trying to help you with something, we did some research and found that you probably are referring to the way the government of the United States had to pay for the Revolutionary War and, among other things, had to issue bonds and paper certificates.

If that is the case, we can comment on the following.

Patriots invited people to buy paper certificates. Yes, Patriots invited people to buy these certificates that were debt certificates issued by the states. These represented war-certificates or bonds that were known as "bills of credit." So Patriots invited people to participate in the purchase of these paper certificates to get their principal back with "juicy" interests. Of course, the colonies won the war. This money would also serve to support and feed the Continental Army troops if they were camping in the area.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which groups of people deny that the holocaust happened?
    10·1 answer
  • Why were the baiga,s not willing to work as labourers​
    5·1 answer
  • Hitlers fame will last because
    8·1 answer
  • What did Hamilton plan to do with the money from taxes? Why did Jefferson and Madison oppose Hamilton’s policies?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the main idea of white mans burden the United States and the Philippines
    14·2 answers
  • What farmer figure emerged from The Hundred Year's War?
    11·1 answer
  • What is an example of a subgroup of Christianity.
    10·2 answers
  • Why did Wilson refuse to recognize the government of<br> Huerta in Mexico?
    6·1 answer
  • I’ll mark u brainliest pls answerrrr
    13·1 answer
  • 11. What were the effects of te<br> Crusades?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!