1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natta225 [31]
3 years ago
15

Briefly explain ONE major difference between VanDeMark’s and McMaster’s historical interpretations of the United States involvem

ent in the Vietnam War.
History
1 answer:
bogdanovich [222]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The difference between McMaster’s and VanDeMark’s in the Vietnam War is given below.

Explanation:

  • VenDemark's perception suggests that somehow the United States intervention in Vietnam occurred purposely carried through by the government of the U.S.
  • Even though the historical or objective understanding of McMaster notes that Johnson had the U.S. participating and performed all this without knowing it.
You might be interested in
How was industrialization in the united kingdom different from industrialization in china
umka2103 [35]
Hey! :)

Industrialization in the UK, and this answer will narrow the UK down to Great Britain and England was indeed different than the industrialization in China. Even without breaking down China's industrialization to the time before and after the Communist Party took over China in 1950, the two countries' industrialization process was vastly different. Here is why:
<span>
England's industrial revolution had its roots in the later part of the 17th Century while China's began much later.

Hope this helps! :)</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PART B: Which phrase from the paragraph best supports the answer to Part A?
Leokris [45]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
If Vietnam fell to communlsm, what consequences dld U.S. leaders think would result?​
masha68 [24]
T^T hehdbsbshhshdhsh
5 0
3 years ago
*PLEASE ANSWER TY!!*
Firdavs [7]

Answer:

I think its c

Explanation:

it makes the most sense

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What led to the emergence of Mysore​
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

Following Tipu's death in the fourth war in the Siege of Seringapatam (1799), large parts of his kingdom were annexed by the British, which signalled the end of a period of Mysorean hegemony over South India. This period (1799–1947) also saw Mysore emerge as one of the important centres of art and culture in India.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the economy of the Old South built on?
    15·1 answer
  • Racism and prejudice are the same thing<br><br><br> True<br><br><br><br> False
    15·1 answer
  • Trump Trade Wars. Read the current event and explain if it is good or bad.<br><br> Plz help
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement is an accurate description of the way the conquistadors treated native Americans
    16·1 answer
  • The map below shows the extent of the Byzantine Empire at three different times in history. Use the map to answer the following
    11·1 answer
  • What did smith think were the advantages of the division of labor?
    12·1 answer
  • Which tribes were from the southwestern part of North America? Select all that apply. Mogollon Shoshone Hohokam Anasazi Adena
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the importance of early Greek philosophers?
    9·1 answer
  • Could anyone help?......
    5·2 answers
  • One of the problems to address at the end
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!